Amit Relan

Fake Reviews Are Destroying the Trust in the Digital Retail Ecosystem

In 2019, 50% of consumers agreed that they always relied on reviews and ratings before making a final buying decision. According to a report, 48% of Indians bought products under the fashion category after reading ratings and reviews. Our research reveals that the proportion of fake reviews on popular e-commerce websites is ‘one-third’ of the total volume of reviews. Misleading and fake reviews violate consumers’ rights under the Consumer Protection Act 2019, which states that consumers have the right to be informed about the price, purity, quality, potency, quantity, or standard of goods or services. Another source revealed that Amazon has more than 1.8 million unverified reviews, with a five-star rating for 99.6 percent of them. Therefore, nearly all brands on the eCommerce marketplace have a higher reliance on unverified reviews and mislead the consumer towards the brand. Reviews have the ability to drastically impact the Search Engine Optimization (SEO) results, which inevitably skews the discoverability of the product on eCommerce search engines. Zero negative reviews means that the brand has achieved eutopia and no longer faces problems from its consumers, which is impossible to achieve. But that is just one part of the story. The impact of fake positive reviews also impacts the discoverability of products on e-commerce platforms. In fact, product listings with higher (fake) positive reviews often become more discoverable to consumers on ecommerce searches, which is a problem eCommerce marketplaces have failed to resolve. Another prerogative of fake reviews is that people making buying decisions feel that the feedback is biased. According to Statista, 38% of consumers felt that the products have a positive bias on eCommerce platforms. It was also the biggest proportion of buyers evaluated before the 2019 pre-festive season in India. A mixture of positive and negative reviews is often found on genuine product listings. Negative reviews are as important as positive reviews, as they display brand authenticity, revoke bias, and help consumers make sound decisions after weighing the cons with the pros of the products on e-commerce platforms. According to a source, 14.6% of global consumers read more than ten reviews before making a final buying decision. The penetration of fake reviews into the digital retail ecosystem not only violates the customer’s informed decision-making right under the EU’s unfair commercial practice directive but also, impacts their final purchase decision. In India, as well, the government is set to bring in a strong framework that will ensure a detailed examination of reviews and ratings to keep the consumers safe. After scanning 223 eCommerce websites, the government body could not predict the authenticity of R&R of 144 websites. The dilemma lies in not being able to predict/reveal whether legitimate consumers are the contributors to R&R. The state of ratings and reviews is also becoming perplexed with the intervention of influencers. Brands ask for video and written reviews from influencers on e-commerce marketplaces in exchange for their product, which further pollutes the credibility of R&R in general. The brand/sellers have gone a step ahead by compensating people with $5-$10 commission, reimbursing product purchase costs, fees, and taxes for an authentic five-star review. According to a report, Facebook groups have become a prominent source for recruiting people to submit fake reviews. It resulted in an average 12.5% increase in sales. How Can Brands Spot Fake Reviews? Today, monitoring and reporting false feedback on product listings is possible through the following methods: Evaluate the User Profile: False reviewers often tend to copy-paste their feedback for multiple product variants. Therefore, evaluating the user profile helps to find similar reviews and ratings in favor or against specific brands. Sight Repetitive Mention of the Brand Name: Another red flag to spot fake reviewers is examining whether the feedback mentions the brand name multiple times. In most instances, the reviewer either appreciates or diminishes the brand reputation by targeting the ‘brand name.’ Such reviews may not offer a true experience and could have been falsely created. Service Providers: Unfortunately, companies are providing fake review services that are operating openly. Brands use their services to create negative reviews for competition and positive reviews for their products. This defeats the purpose of maintaining the much-required trust and transparency in digital retail. Ideally, the government should clamp them down. Behavior Analysis: Marketplaces like Amazon, Flipkart, and others often have two forms of reviewers, namely, verified and unverified. Generally, fake reviews are usually associated with unverified profiles. Their behavior would reveal that they visit a product page and leave instantly after submitting their feedback. They could also leave multiple reviews in different time frames using multiple unverified profiles. Conclusion Today, the government understands the impact of fake reviews on online shoppers and e-commerce platforms. Their sheer step into the forefront for vetting the authenticity of the reviews and ratings is a clear sign of making drastic changes in the digital retail ecosystem in this regard. Eliminating companies offering fake review services or eliminating paid reviewers may be a stepping stone, but the real change will happen when brands understand the importance of unbiased reviews by genuine reviewers or people with verified profiles. Ecommerce Analytics, a.k.a. mScanIt, powered by mFilterIt, has become a credible solution for global businesses that want insights at variant, category, platform, and other levels. To know more, get in touch with our experts today!

Fake Reviews Are Destroying the Trust in the Digital Retail Ecosystem Read More »

brand-safety

Why Brand Safety is an Immediate Concern in India?

Brands have to repeatedly reach out to the same set of users, and they need to live up to their reputation to knock on the same doors again and again. The Indian broadband subscriber journey has been incredible over the past decade. By the end of 2020, India had over 747 million broadband subscribers over wireless and wired mediums as against a mere 10.92 million in December 2010. The threshold for defining broadband has also doubled from 256 KBPS to 512 KBPS. These broadband subscribers have become synonymous with Internet subscribers in India as narrowband technologies contribute insignificantly to the subscriber base. For digital marketers, it’s great news that our Internet users are increasing and at the same time have broadband access where they can consume a lot of content as well as immersive ads. So, not only textual simple ads can be served, but brands can serve video and other rich multimedia ads also. In 2016, when the widespread uptake of cellular broadband started in India after Jio commercially launched 4G LTE services, other operators like Airtel and Vodafone were pushed to quickly launch 4G services. We have seen many redefining moments in telecom since the entry of Jio. But what is a matter of concern is we are adding up new subscribers at a declining growth rate. For instance, in 2017 we added 54% new broadband subscribers while fell to 13% in 2020. This is expected behavior as we are achieving complete coverage of the population in India through digital services. For digital advertising, there is an important implication to understand. Somewhere, we are okay to have inefficiencies in digital campaigns. Generally, we would make a mass outreach and expect certain industry norms-based engagement rates. Many marketers are fine with 2-3% CTR, which means for every 100 people reached, we expect a tangible outcome only from 2-3 people. Now with this approach, we could afford the churn. Most likely, as 97-98% would not engage beyond a point, it would also hide the BOT engagement. Hence, ad fraud. Similarly, if anyone in the audience would not engage because of any brand safety issue, it would not make much of a difference earlier. The reason was, that there were still a lot of audiences available in subsequent campaigns with the overall digital user base growing in India. But now, this place is saturated, and we don’t have much room left to add more new users. This means every time a campaign would be served to more or less the same audience. In this case, achieving the highest degree of Brand Safety with campaigns becomes very important. This will ensure that the audience being served with campaigns does not form a wrong perception about the brand which will discourage and disinterest them from engaging in the future. Even though there is some degree of target marketing using digital mediums, a lot of it still happens through hit and trial and experimentation. This means a campaign manager has to reach out to the same profile many a time with different products and services to gauge the interest beyond as may be defined by key profile parameters. For instance, a specific audience profile might not be interested in a smartphone campaign but may be extremely interested in a TWS earbud campaign. While at the broader level, the campaign audience remains the same, the results of the campaign could differ remarkably. For such instances, an advertiser cannot afford to lose a user basis any distasteful experience that primarily results from a brand safety issue. With the potential digital users hitting a plateau, there is little chance for any advertiser to widen the reach beyond a certain point. It has to nurture its audience without fail and keep them receptive to its campaigns always. The relevancy of the campaign may go high or low depending on other factors that are not defined by the profile. What is important is that the advertiser’s message is received positively and engaged further by a potential buyer to decide accordingly. Advertisers and their agencies, have to realize the importance of brand safety, especially when a new addition to the digital user base is diminishing. They have to jointly ensure that the advertisement elements and the mediums through which they are delivered are brand-safe and do not result in an experience that pushes even a genuine user to discontinue the campaigns as its positioning is negatively impacted owing to brand safety issues like using an inappropriate keyword, insensitive messaging, false promise, or many such cases that panic a brand’s reputation. The digital user base in India will not grow as before giving any advertiser fewer opportunities to get new users to engage every time. They will have to nurture the same set of people and cannot afford to go wrong by creating a bad impression. Earlier, inefficiencies or wrongs in a campaign were offset by targeting a fresh set of users. Now every advertiser and its partner have to be mindful of nurturing the community in a very clean and pure environment. That’s the new hygiene!

Why Brand Safety is an Immediate Concern in India? Read More »

sms-fraud

An Era of SMS Fraud

In an ever-evolving mobile communication ecosystem, text messaging has revolutionized the way in which people and businesses communicate. From a one-on-one communication perspective to a comprehensive mobile marketing platform for businesses, over 18 million texts are sent every minute, which keeps growing every day. The growing success of SMS (Short Message Service), MMS mobile marketing platforms has lured cybercriminals to take advantage of users and expand the SMS threat landscape. “Your bank accounts have been temporarily suspended. To unlock your card, click here-” The message captures the user’s attention immediately and an instant reaction will prompt them to click on the said link. Such messages are socially engineered attacks that are referred to as ‘Smishing’(SMS phishing), much like an email phishing attack, which tricks the user into providing information that benefits the fraudster. Despite having spam filters on mobile devices, such messages can bypass security walls to enter your device. “Congratulations! You’ve won a gift card worth Rs.2500 on a recent payment of your credit card. Click on the link to claim the reward” Such messages have a higher open rate as people are misguided into thinking that the sender is the bank and the prize being offered is legitimate (owing to rising online transactions in the wake of COVID-19). Given the nature of SMS, dangerous URLs are disguised as harmless web pages. In an era of one-click marketing where the goal is to garner response through a direct reply or clicking on a link to complete the survey and take home a coupon, fraudsters use it to their advantage using the same technique. Thus, the SMS threat landscape expands as users click the link without verifying the URL and sharing their information. In other instances, the text directs the victims to a website on the pretext of a small gift in exchange for survey participation. The website asks for credit/debit cards, personal details, or bank account numbers to cover the shipping charges, and the victim falls prey to such schemes’ by divulging the details without a second thought. The entire notion for fraudsters revolves around incentive-based fraud which rarely raises suspicious eyes. In a recent incident, fraudsters targeted PayPal users by sending SMS which said that their account had been ‘permanently limited’. In order to verify the account, the user had to log in using their PayPal credentials to get it up and running again following the link shared on the SMS. The webpage had all the elements of an authentic PayPal website, only with different URLs that went unnoticed by victims. Another payment processor, PayTm, has also been a victim of SMS fraud. All mobile marketing platforms and businesses are in a tough spot as such frauds are an inherent risk to their brand reputation and revenue streams. Protection against SMS fraud is an important element of not just brand safety but also an important application of mobile security and data protection. All such personalized messages, and branding content that looks legitimate can be a sign of SMS fraud. Fake branding is a scammer’s favorite weapon to trick people. It is important to have tools and measures in place to verify the authenticity of the texts and always be cautious before clicking on any unwanted link to keep trouble away.

An Era of SMS Fraud Read More »

brand-safety

Brand Safety and Celebrity Endorsements

A close eye on Brand Safety can help brands as well as celebrities to leverage associations more effectively. Celebrities have their own lives.  They have their own thought process, value systems, and opinions which at times could go against the positioning of a brand they are endorsing.  Also, celebrities are high-interest people, and any action or posture they take, especially after the advent of social media, in all probability also makes the associated brands a party to a possible controversy. Similarly, sometimes a brand gets into serious trouble and the celebrity also starts trending on social media for negative sentiment.  In recent times we had two very widely talked about situations where brands and the celebrities endorsing them postured in opposite directions.  One was when Sourav Ganguly had to undergo heart treatment while he endorses a particular variant of Fortune edible oil which talks about its positive impact on health, especially the heart of a person. At the same time Akshay Kumar, not only features in ‘unlock’ campaigns of the government but also endorses Dabur Chyawanprash as an immunity booster where a specific campaign talks about the protection offered against COVID-19 by the chyawanprash by having 2 spoons of it daily, has also tested positive as per media reports of April 4th. In both situations, the celebrities have fallen to medical conditions which the products they are endorsing claim to offer protection against.  Similarly, some celebrities could be in the midst of any controversy making it difficult for the brands they endorse to manage the situation.  They cannot disassociate themselves and at the same time, they don’t want to harm their brand reputation. Close monitoring of Brand Safety over digital mediums can be an effective way of handling such situations where the damage control can be activated instantaneously helping a brand to minimize the impact.  In such situations, the brands can quickly get a complete view of where such campaigns are appearing which they may want to put on hold for some time till the issue is resolved or goes off the radar of ‘digital miscreants’ who always keep on looking for such issues to start conversations and threads on social media, like Twitter. Likewise, celebrities must understand the brand safety of any brand before they decide to go about endorsing it.  There could be some aberrations that the celebrity can ignore, but if it finds that a brand is habitually putting its brand reputation at risk, the celebrity should choose not to endorse it. This will also add to the reputation of the celebrities who will not be seen as endorsing just for the fee they get. Medical conditions can change at times for anyone including celebrities.  At the same time, there are proven clinical reports for brands to make their claims which they do through ads in which celebrities humanize them.  But we have to understand that most of the claims are not for 100% results.  There is always an iota of opposite behavior expected in terms of effect and results.  Also, the product that is being positioned for protecting against a medical condition never offers umbrella protection. It can at best protect from a few causes, while there could be still a few that may land a person, including the celebrity, in the same medical condition. From a brand reputation management point of view, brands, as well as celebrities, need to have a real-time view of what each other is doing which could attract negative attention from audiences on digital platforms like social media.  Both must have mechanisms in place to monitor each other and pause the association in the interest of long-term association with each other as part of any potential crisis management. Brand Safety solutions can give this real-time intelligence to brands, agencies managing them as well and celebrities to derive maximum out of the association and create a complimenting synergy between the brand and the celebrity.

Brand Safety and Celebrity Endorsements Read More »

brand-safety

Brand Safety is an Ethical Responsibility of the Brand Towards Its Stakeholders

“Congratulations! We’re calling from WhatsApp and your number has won a lottery of 25 lakh!” Does this message or call sound familiar? Welcome to the internet or online fraud world, which costs individuals lakhs of rupees. Such scams are continuously evolving, and India alone has witnessed 65% of businesses losing money on account of online fraud. According to NCRB’s Crime in India report, 2019, fraud made up over half the cybercrime cases in the country. In one such case of a cyber scam, fraudsters use WhatsApp to con people off their money. These scammers call themselves representatives of WhatsApp and Kaun Banega Crorepati (the Indian adaptation of ‘Who wants to be a millionaire?’) team and inform the victim that their number has won prize money by participating in the quiz. Not only this, but it also informed the victim that names such as Mukesh Ambani, Narendra Modi, and Amitabh Bachchan are funding the prize money. The victim is then asked to deposit somewhere between Rs 8,000 and Rs 10,000 as tax money or processing fee at SBI bank to enable the KBC team to send the prize money of Rs 25 or Rs 30 lakh. Thousands of individuals have fallen prey to such scams. In the quoted incident, the scammers are banking upon the trust and reputation established by these brands (WhatsApp, Reliance, Amitabh Bachchan, SBI). Companies who only look at this issue from a prism of brand protection miss one central point, ‘Customer is God’. In such scenarios, their customers are being defrauded, phished, and even sold counterfeit goods that they think come from their trusted brands. The internet user base stands at 624 million in India, and India is also WhatsApp’s biggest market with 340 million users. Now, one can only imagine the vastness and extent to which these frauds have penetrated the market. The anonymity being offered by the internet presents an advantage to criminals for they use fake trademarks, tags, emblems, and even bogus certification labels to convince the victim of the genuineness of the brand, often referred to as identity theft or infringement, which again becomes a significant issue for a brand. This also brings to light another component of brand safety, keeping the above incident in mind- privacy. What measures are taken by a brand to ensure that consumer data is held safe and their privacy is honored? With scammers having access to their victims’ personal information and databases, does this not become a significant aspect of brand safety for companies? Brand safety — keeping a brand’s campaign and reputation safe from online frauds and scams — has become one of the most critical components in the marketing industry today. In these incredibly challenging times, brand owners should step up to the plate by deploying necessary brand safety measures- tools to analyze the content and intention of these scams’ fraud detection mechanisms to ensure that they are getting visibility into the threats against the brand. A scammer is doing this under the garb of a brand. This is one of the ‘safest’ frauds for any scammer. A scammer has nothing to lose. The identity created online is fake, and it reaches out to people in the name of a reputed brand. Such fraud happens because everyday internet users entertain such messages only because they have confidence in the brand being infringed. In the example shown in this writeup, the fraudsters use a mix of endorsers who have emotional, social, and business appeal. Such a mix makes the possibility of someone falling to it high. A brand has to act responsibly and ensure its brand cannot be misused or abused by scamsters digitally or otherwise to fraud people who have high esteem for it. Brand safety may not be perceived as having a direct impact on the Balance Sheet and P&L statement (though it has). However, brands must ensure the safety of their name and other trademarks and set it out as a practice of business ethics – a set of principles governing the conduct of a business. The current situation presents a ‘dream opportunity for scammers and a nightmare for brand owners’ to identify these threats in real time. Absolute brand safety lies in the blending of protective elements. Stay vigilant! Check out how we at mFilterIt help you achieve Brand Safety. Do you want to know more about our Brand Safety solutions, fill up your details, and we will reach out to you 1 business day.

Brand Safety is an Ethical Responsibility of the Brand Towards Its Stakeholders Read More »

atma-nirbhar-bharat

Brand Safety is a Big Opportunity for Atma Nirbhar Bharat, and at mFilterIt, We Are Pursuing It.

To solve Brand Safety issues effectively, the nuanced understanding of vernacular is the essence for AI and ML-based solutions to work. This can only be handled by a local brand that recognizes the local languages. Globally, brands are becoming conscious of Brand Safety. Introducing Brand Safety at a 30,000 feet height is about keeping a brand secure from every potential controversy or damage that could result from its presence at irrelevant and unsafe digital assets. No brand would want to earn wrath by getting associated, or at least the audience perceiving them so, with something that goes against their philosophy.   A brand would never want its ads to appear on sites, apps, and video channels that do not reflect it. Not just because it would not get the right target audiences, but also because its positioning would go for a toss.   For example, an airline company would never want its ads displayed on video series like an air crash investigation. Here, even if the audience might be relevant, the sentiment set out by the content would not appreciate air traveling, at least at that spur of a moment when a viewer’s mind could be thinking that air travel isn’t perhaps safe. Additionally, there is abusive content, obscene content, and so forth.   Even if a very relevant website for a brand to display its ad has content in any local language and is abusive or foul language, the brand would never want its ad to appear there. There are essentially two core requirements for a Brand Safety solution to work.   One is the algorithm tree that will trigger needful actions based on the event we want to monitor. The other is the database of keywords, phrases, audio, images, and video, which can compare the content in real-time to decide if the content is safe for the brand to get associated with.   This understanding can only be managed by a local Brand Safety solution provider, which constantly keeps the library of potentially unsafe content updated and lets its algorithms decide whether the placement of a brand’s ad is safe.   With the Honourable Prime Minister already having advocated for Vocal4Local and Atma Nirbar Bharat initiatives, Brand Safety is an area that naturally fits the program, where achieving self-reliance makes economic sense and has a highly great product relevance.   Platforms like YouTube are increasingly becoming the default internet space for regional content in India. This content runs thousands of ads from different brands that would never understand the content. In situations like this, where a locally developed solution will make a lot of difference.   The opportunity for Brand Safety is immense. Every brand is not conscious of it, and some have already started proactively taking measures to tackle Brand Safety challenges. Over the next 5 years, brands will start making considerable spending on achieving Brand Safety. With the recent trend of digital becoming a mainstream interface and D2C (direct-to-consumer) also gaining momentum, it would be incumbent on brands to have zero tolerance towards Brand Safety. This is an opportune moment for the entire ecosystem to pitch for locally designed and developed Brand Safety solutions.   Thankfully, at mFilterIt, we are already on the charter, and every day our portfolio of locally designed and developed Brand Safety Solutions becomes wider. We aspire to make digital space a trustworthy, reliable, and accurate experience world. Our endeavor to make a Brand Safety portfolio a comprehensive solution offering end-to-end safety is a step in this direction. To know more, get in touch with our experts today!

Brand Safety is a Big Opportunity for Atma Nirbhar Bharat, and at mFilterIt, We Are Pursuing It. Read More »

Scroll to Top