Anisha Gupta

building-trust-in- affiliate-marketing-emerging-fraud-challenges-& -solutions-for-2025

Building Trust in Affiliate Marketing: Emerging Fraud Challenges & Solutions for 2025

Affiliate marketing, as a concept, is revolutionary. It enables businesses to make money by using the influence of popular online publishers. When the right affiliates are involved, affiliate marketing not only drives more sales, but also boosts long-term brand performance metrics like brand recall value and trustworthiness of the brand.   At the same time, by design, affiliate marketing ensures the publishers bring their A-game in getting brands maximum visibility and ensuring their audiences view them in a positive light. After all, more sales also translate to better affiliate payouts for the publishers.   Thanks to this symbiotic nature of affiliate marketing, it is nearly the perfect marketing activity. Nearly.   Instances of affiliate marketing fraud can quickly impact the fantastic results of even the most carefully executed campaigns. Fraud associated with affiliate marketing can drain ad budgets and bring low-intent users to interact with brand’s ad campaigns.   Thankfully, advertisers are not powerless in the face of affiliate marketing fraud. In fact, by employing affiliate monitoring and brand safety best practices, advertisers can completely eliminate the threat of affiliate marketing fraud.   However, before we begin discussing how affiliate fraud prevention works, let’s quickly size up the threat that is affiliate marketing fraud.   The Rising Threat of Affiliate Fraud in 2025  In the next two years, the affiliate marketing market is expected to grow to a whopping $27.78 billion. While this might seem like great news, it also means that fraudsters have that much more incentive to come up with sophisticated ways to commit fraud and dupe advertisers. According to mFilterIt analysis, 43% of the fraudulent traffic is coming from affiliate networks in India.   Where there is money, the instances of fraud also rise. Similarly, in the space of affiliate marketing, Affiliate fraud has existed almost since the inception of this marketing channel . As digital technologies became more accessible, affiliate fraud practices evolved in tandem with the evolution of affiliate marketing itself and alarmingly, the trend continues.   Today, fraudsters have access to sophisticated artificial intelligence models and automation technologies, enabling them to commit fraud in complex and hard to detect ways. At the same time, such technologies also enable bad actors to commit fraud on an expansive scale, targeting both web and app ecosystems. For brands, these activities translate to a damaged brand reputation, inflated customer acquisition costs, and poor user retention.   How are such fraudulent schemes implemented? Which are the most common ones? Knowledge is the first step to prevention. Let’s peek behind the curtains of affiliate marketing fraud:  Common Affiliate Fraud Techniques & Their Impact  Fraudsters have found various methods to corrupt the affiliate schemes to use to their advantage. While there are some common methods, with evolving technology fraudsters have found new and advanced ways to commit fraud. Some of them are here:   – Incent Fraud   Running incent campaigns is perhaps one of the oldest forms of affiliate fraud and yet, it is exceptionally difficult to detect before the fraud has made a significant dent in your marketing budget. Simply put, affiliates incentivize their audience with a reward in exchange for completing a specific action, such as downloading an app and completing an action once the download is complete. Incentives can include small rewards such as loyalty points or even a small share of the affiliate payout.   Since the users complete these actions because of the lure of the reward offered by the affiliate they seldom have any genuine interest in interacting with the advertiser’s app or website. As a result, the advertiser ends up paying for the interactions with these uninterested users while gaining nothing of significance in exchange. This further leads to a high uninstall rate and the advertiser has to pay more to acquire more customers.   – Brand Bidding   This is especially problematic for brand bidding as it drains their marketing budget twice as fast. By bidding for the same keywords as the brand, fraudsters increase the competition around those keywords, leading to an inflated cost-per-click (CPC) paid by the brand. Additionally, the brand still ends up paying much more than the CPC for the traffic it loses in the ads as it is redirected to their website as affiliate traffic by the fraudsters.  – Trademark Misuse  Another common yet clever form of affiliate fraud is impersonation. Fraudulent publishers create fake websites that share striking similarities with an advertiser’s website. Using these, fraudsters may impersonate the brand to attract high-intent traffic and then use affiliate links from the real brand on their fake websites to get affiliate rewards.   – Cookie Stuffing & Attribution Fraud  With cookie stuffing, fraudulent affiliates drop a cookie in the user’s browser when they visit a brand’s website. This way, even if the user visits the brand’s website directly, the attribution of the sale is allocated to the fraudster, enabling them to get affiliate commission for a sale they did not enable.   This not only results in the brand paying affiliate commission on an organic sale, it also manipulates the sales metrics, making data unreliable.  – Fake Lead Generation & Form Spamming  One of the most common tools employed for committing click fraud is a bot. Fraudsters use a network of bots with varying sophistication to complete tasks that get them affiliate revenue. Bots are programmed to act like real human users and generate clicks and fill out lead generation forms with fake information.   If an advertiser pays affiliate commissions for lead generation actions, they may easily fall victim to a fake lead generation and form spamming fraud. This can not only lead to wasted marketing spending and poor conversion rate, but it can also have a long-lasting impact on the advertiser’s overall marketing efforts because it dilutes and skews their marketing performance and CRM data.   – Misuse of Advertiser’s Brand Assets  In some cases, fraudsters may stoop down to directly scam the users. While this usually does not lead to wastage of marketing budgets, it can hurt advertisers and brands in other equally significant ways.  Fraudsters may create fake

Building Trust in Affiliate Marketing: Emerging Fraud Challenges & Solutions for 2025 Read More »

blind-spot

The Blind Spot: Advertisers’ Limited Visibility into Contributing Publishers

With the rapid growth in the mobile app ecosystem, the number of fraudulent activities is also increasing at the speed of lightning. From the installs to events, the fraudsters have become smart enough to tamper with these metrics and steal the advertiser’s money. One of the common and sophisticated types of mobile ad fraud is Click Injection. Click Injection is a technique that not only impacts the advertisers but also the genuine publishers who are generating real traffic. Here is a handy guide to know how click injection impacts your app and how the click injection rule can help combat this threat. What is Click Injection? Click injection is a sophisticated form of mobile ad fraud that is used to manipulate app installs. It is a technique where a malicious app or a spoofed SDK in a user’s device fires an ad click between the duration of a genuine app download till it’s first open. The genuine publisher loses their payout as the last click is attributed to a fraudulent install. How does Click Injection happen? How mFilterIt Protect Against Click Injection? Due to the last click attribution, the install is attributed to the publisher who has fired the last click on the advertisement. However, the fraudulent publishers steal the last click attribution by firing a click just before the app install completes. To detect this anomaly, we apply our click injection rule which analyses the concentration of clicks by contributing publishers for a specific publisher in a day. And if the clicks by contributing publishers exceed 40%, then we analyze the time difference between the clicks (the time when the first click on the ad happened and the time when the contributor click happened) If the click happens within a certain timeframe, then we mark it as fraud. To simplify this further, this pattern happens when the publisher is involved in a click-injection activity. Otherwise, the chances of this happening are minuscule. These checks are conducted on three levels to get a deep-dive understanding of the anomalies in the installs and give transparency to the advertisers to evaluate their ad traffic quality. Real Case To explain this better, we have taken an example of a publisher who was actively involved in these kinds of activities. We observed the installs from this particular publisher for a period of 15 days in which he gave 11,917 installs out of which 6,434 installs were contributed by other publishers or came organically. This consisted of 54% of the total traffic. According to the click injection rule, we marked all the records as a fraud whose difference was within a certain timeframe. It’s Not All Black There is a grey zone in the digital ecosystem. Not all contributing publishers are participants in mobile ad fraud. Some of them are unaware of the fraudulent activities that happen within the app they publish or distribute. While there are some contributing publishers who are misled by fraudulent app developers or ad networks. This led to financial losses for not just the advertisers but the genuine contributing publishers as the fraudulent publishers steal their share of revenue by capturing the last-click attribution. Way Forward The fraudulent techniques in the digital ecosystem are becoming sophisticated and discreet with every passing day. Due to this, marketers are in a constant dilemma of choosing the right media partner to advertise with confidence. Therefore, validating the ad traffic from publishers and sub-publishers has become a necessity to ensure that there is transparency and trust among all parties. With the right ad traffic validation solution, marketers can get clarity on their ad traffic, and decide which channels they need to focus on to get greater returns. Marketers, it’s time to leave the old ways and advertise fearlessly with a media partner you can trust!

The Blind Spot: Advertisers’ Limited Visibility into Contributing Publishers Read More »

Scroll to Top