mFilterIt
Contact Us
mfilterit

mFilterIt Experts

Decoding complex digital challenges like ad fraud, brand safety, brand protection, and ecommerce intelligence for brands to help them advertise fearlessly.

Brand Bidding Violations in USA

Brand Bidding Violations in PPC Campaigns: What It Is, How It Hurts, and How to Stop It

Blog, Affiliate /

Your brand name is the busiest doorway in town, so who’s greeting your customers before you even get there?  Every day, thousands of shoppers search for brands directly on Google and more than half of them are discovering or choosing a brand at that very moment. This makes your brand keywords the heart of your PPC strategy, driving the most ready-to-convert users straight to you.  Brand bidding in USA is a common practice, but brand bidding violation is a hoax caused by foul market players who target your brand keywords by quietly bidding on them, hijacking your organic conversions, and damaging your brand reputation.  While teams try to manually monitor these violations, their checks often remain limited to what can be seen on the surface. With so many variables and constant shifts in search environments, even strong teams may miss deeper violations.  In this blog, you will discover –  How brand bidding violations ruin your PPC campaigns  Who is responsible for brand bidding violations  What makes brand bidding violation tough to tackle  Signs to identify brand bidding violations  Why manual monitoring isn’t enough to catch PPC fraud  How mFilterIt puts a defined halt to brand bidding violations  How Brand Bidding Violation Impacts Your PPC Campaigns  PPC is all about showing your brand to the most relevant audience at the right time. You bid on keywords your audience is searching for, your ad appears instantly, and you capture demand from users already interested in what you offer.  But foul market players redirect your traffic to their landing pages or make your organic traffic reach your website through their tracking link. This advertising abuse damages your PPC campaigns and cause –  Higher CPC With No Real Gain When dishonest players bid on your brand terms without permission, they drive up the auction price, making you pay higher for your own organic traffic.  Stolen High-Intent Traffic Brand bidding violations hijack the most expected conversions to someone else’s landing page.  Skewed Campaign Performance & Reporting Lower CTR, inflated spend, and misleading attribution make it harder to evaluate your campaign metrics.  Reduced ROAS & Wasted Budget You lose budget fighting against unnecessary competition, reducing ROAS and hurting efficiency across the entire funnel.  Brand Dilution and Confusion Unapproved ads can create misleading ad copies, and wrong offers on brand’s name, diluting brand credibility.  Leakage in the Conversion Funnel Traffic that should have organically reached your website gets rerouted to fake coupon sites, unapproved resellers, creating huge drops in conversion rate.  Who Are Bidding on Your Brand Keywords?   Multiple fraudulent players are responsible for advertising abuse like brand bidding violations as they gain traction for the traffic that was already yours. They include –  Affiliates Some affiliates bid on your branded keywords, causing affiliate marketing fraud to hijack your organic traffic and then sell it back to you for a commission. They run ads above your website on search engines like Google and capture audience’s attention.  For instance – A user aimed at purchasing cosmetics from your brand and while he was willingly going on the website, an eye-catchy phrase like “Grab Best Offers – Avail Now,” caught his attention and he clicked on it. That is, your organic traffic getting redirected through an affiliate’s link, making affiliate earning commission on it.  Competitors/Rivals Many competitors directly bid on your branded keywords, openly stealing the attention followed by stolen conversions.  For instance – A user searches for “YourBrand shoes” on Google, intending to buy directly from you. But instead of your ad appearing first, a competitor like “StrideMax Shoes – Better Than YourBrand” shows up at the top with a paid ad. This way user gets redirected to the competitor’s product page, and your high-intent customer is captured by a rival brand.  Resellers/Distributors Resellers use your brand keywords to push their own listings, often outranking your official ads.  For instance – A user searches for “YourBrand smartwatch” on Google. Instead of your official product page showing at the top, a reseller runs an ad like “Buy YourBrand Smartwatch – In Stock at Reseller’s Name.” Their paid listing appears above your own ad, so the shopper clicks the reseller’s result and buys from them instead of your official store.  Coupon/Deal Sites Coupon sites run Google Ads on searches like “YourBrand discount,” “YourBrand offers,” “YourBrand coupon,” or even just your brand name.  For Instance – A user searches for “YourBrand promo code” or even just “YourBrand” on Google. At the top, they see a paid ad from a coupon site like “SaveBigDeals – YourBrand 50% OFF Today!” The user clicks the ad expecting a real discount, lands on a coupon page with generic or expired codes and then gets redirected to your website.  Why it is difficult to detect Brand Bidding Violation?   There are many sophisticated techniques used by fraudsters to perform the violations of brand bidding practices. These tactics often remain undetected due to limited capabilities of manual monitoring. Here’s what they include –  Geo-targeting tricks – They show violating ads only in countries you don’t check.  Dayparting – Ads run late at night or early morning when no one on your team is watching.  Cloaking – They hide their violating ads from your team by blocking your IPs, devices, or browsers, so the ads appear only to real customers and stay invisible during your checks.  Dynamic ad copy switching – Some affiliates change their ad text automatically depending on who is searching. To real customers, the ad shows trademarked terms like “YourBrand Deals”, but when your team or monitoring tools check, the ad instantly switches to safe, generic text, making the violation hard to detect.  Know why brand bidding in affiliate marketing is riskier in 2025 Top 5 Red Flags to Identify Common Brand Bidding Violations  Brand bidding violations are critical to identify. Watch out for these red flags to spot them before the damage is done.   Top Signs to Identify Brand Bidding Violations Branded CPC Spike – Your cost per click suddenly rises on your own brand name.  Organic Traffic Drop – Fewer users reach you through branded organic searches.  Paid Clicks Surge – You start paying for traffic you normally get for free.  Misleading Ad Copy – Ads use phrases like “YourBrand deals” or “official offers.”  Odd Conversion Patterns – Conversions spike at unusual hours or unfamiliar locations.  How Your Team Misses Brand Bidding Violations  Brand bidding looks easy to monitor until you realize how many combinations you actually need to check. Affiliates don’t violate rules everywhere, they do it selectively, in places your team isn’t watching.  The Real Monitoring Load (Simplified Example) Say you have:  40 branded keyword variations  8 regions to monitor  3 browsers (Chrome, Safari, Firefox)  2 device types (mobile + desktop)  That’s:   40 × 8 × 3 × 2 = 1,920 checks per audit  Now add time:  1 search ≈

Brand Bidding Violations in PPC Campaigns: What It Is, How It Hurts, and How to Stop It Read More »

Advertisers learning how to avoid underblocking and overblocking to ensure brand safety in ad placements

Brand Safety: How Advertisers Can Avoid Underblocking and Overblocking Ad Placements

Blog, Brand Safety & Suitability /

What if your ads aren’t reaching the people you want, but are still showing up in places you never approved? That’s the hidden problem with keyword overblocking and underblocking. When you overblock, your brand loses visibility in safe and relevant environments, allowing competitors to dominate the spaces you should have owned. When you underblock, your ads risk appearing next to unsafe or irrelevant content, hurting your brand reputation and audience trust. This creates a clear domino effect: lost reach, weaker impact, wasted budgets, and declining brand credibility. And most brands don’t even realize that these issues start with one flawed assumption; that keyword blocking alone can keep their ads safe. In this blog, we break down why keyword blocking as a brand safety strategy is fundamentally limited, what brands really need to understand about ad placement quality, and how they can make better, context-aware decisions. We’ll also explore how mFilterIt’s brand safety solution gives you accurate, real-time visibility and ensures your ads show up exactly where they should, without compromising reach or brand reputation. What is Underblocking and Overblocking of Ad Placements and What Causes Them? Underblocking happens when ads appear next to content that is unsafe, unsuitable, or misaligned with the brand’s image. This includes news about violence, misinformation, hate speech, extremist views, or overly negative content. What causes underblocking of ad placements? Relying only on basic keyword blocklists methods No understanding of page-level meaning, intent, or sentiment Filters that cannot interpret regional languages or cultural context Lack of monitoring of publishers, apps, or channels Limited detection of low-quality or fraudulent environments Overblocking occurs when ads are restricted from being placed next to content that is actually safe, relevant, and appropriate. This reduces delivery scale and prevents ads from reaching potential audiences. What causes overblocking of ad placements? Relying on broad keyword filters One-size-fits-all global safety settings Filters unable to differentiate between informational vs harmful content Blocking entire topics or domains due to a single keyword Misinterpretation of regional or cultural content Consequences of Keyword Overblocking and Underblocking: What Advertisers Miss Many advertisers feel that keyword-based filters are enough to prevent their ads from unsafe placements. This has been their go-to strategy for brand safety. However, this approach leaves huge gaps in the process of brand safety and protection. Keyword systems only catch what they are explicitly asked for, leading to overblocking or underblocking of ad placements in many scenarios. For example, a family-focused FMCG brand’s ad may appear beside a YouTube video with explicit visuals, even though the video title contains harmless keywords. Without visual and sentiment analysis, the placement slips through keyword filters, allowing the ad to run beside inappropriate content that damages brand perception. This is an example of underblocking and here are the consequences underblocking of ad placements leads to: Brand Safety Concerns When ads appear next to harmful or controversial content, consumers may directly associate the brand with negativity. A single unsafe ad placement can trigger brand reputation risks and backlash across social platforms. Exposure to Fraud or Low-Quality Traffic Underblocking often means ads might show up on low-quality MFA websites or spam pages, leading to inflated impressions and wasted spending. Poor Conversion Efficiency Ads may appear in irrelevant or unsafe environments, where users are less likely to engage or convert—driving up CPA and reducing return on ad spend. Compliance & Suitability Failures Regulated industries like BFSI, healthcare, or kids’ categories face stricter content rules. Underblocking increases the risk of ads appearing in restricted categories. Let’s take an example of overblocking. This approach cuts advertisers off from massive amounts of safe, high-quality content. An article with a headline like “Virat Kohli’s cover drive continues to kill it this season” triggers the word ‘kill’ (in the keyword blocklist) even though the tone is celebratory and the content is 100% safe. Yet sports advertisers lose access to one of the most engaged audiences in India. Here are the consequences overblocking of ad placements leads to: Loss of High-Quality Inventory High-quality audiences and impressions on safe and suitable pages are blocked due to overly broad filters, shrinking available inventory. Limited Reach & High Media Costs Campaigns struggle to meet delivery goals because a large number of potential placements are unnecessarily excluded. When inventory is restricted, competition increases. CPMs, CPCs, and CPA all rise, impacting efficiency. Missed Opportunities During festivals, sports events, elections, or national news moments, content volumes surge. Overblocking prevents advertisers from leveraging these high-engagement opportunities. How Advertisers Can Avoid Overblocking and Underblocking of Ad Placements To avoid underblocking and overblocking, advertisers need to leverage advanced brand safety solutions to evaluate each ad placement not just by keywords but by what the content means, what message it communicates, its sentiment, and how it is interpreted in a regional context. Analyse Placements Based on Content Understanding the actual subject of a page (and just matching keywords) helps ensure ads appear in relevant, safe environments. Content-level analysis prevents brands from unintentionally blocking large volumes of safe inventory simply because they contain a certain word, phrase, or product reference. This safeguards scale without compromising suitability. Analyse Placements Based on Context Context determines whether a keyword appears in an informative, neutral, or harmful environment. Contextual targeting helps advertisers distinguish between high-quality content and genuinely unsafe pages. This prevents underblocking on risky pages and overblocking on harmless ones, improving both brand safety and delivery efficiency. Analyse Sentiment to Understand Tone of the Content Sentiment analysis evaluates whether the content is positive, neutral, or negative. Even if the topic is safe, negative sentiment can misalign with brand values. Sentiment filters help advertisers avoid negative associations while still accessing neutral or positive content that offers high engagement potential. Analyse Regional Nuances of the Ad Placements In diverse countries like India, regional content often includes multilingual terms, cultural references, slang, and context-specific meanings. Generic filters miss these nuances, leading to misclassification and misalignment of content. Brand safety solutions with regional intelligence filters help advertisers stay safe across diverse markets while maintaining access to

Brand Safety: How Advertisers Can Avoid Underblocking and Overblocking Ad Placements Read More »

Device Fraud in USA

Device Fraud in Affiliate Marketing: How Traffic Validation Restores 30% ROAS

Blog, Ad Fraud /

Is your organic traffic, your paid campaigns, and all the SEO work you invest in truly delivering the results you expect?  In many cases — no.  And it’s not because the strategy is flawed, it’s because something else is quietly getting in the way.  Behind the dashboards and performance reports, device-level fraud has become one of the biggest hidden blockers of real growth. On the surface, everything looks normal, clicks, traffic and app installs, all seem healthy, yet conversions don’t add up.  This blog breaks down-  What is really happening at the device level  How these patterns impact your affiliate marketing programs   How right ad traffic validation can be a game changer for your affiliate marketing programs  Major Device Fraud Tactics Explained: What’s Really Going Wrong Device fraud happens when dishonest affiliates fake or manipulate device-related information. This helps them carry out fraud in affiliate marketing campaigns while avoiding security checks. Three major device fraud tactics include –  Automated Clicks, Now Powered by Bots and Device Simulators Bots and advanced device simulators imitate human behavior so well that their clicks look completely legitimate on the surface with neat traffic patterns, realistic device IDs, and even believable geolocation signals. They click on ads, install apps, open them, and even perform basic events. But there is no ‘real user’ behind hence no real conversions, only inflated metrics. What looks like healthy traffic is often an illusion generated by automated systems.  Impact – This leads to wasted ad spend, misleading insights, and poor marketing decisions driven by fake traffic instead of real customers.  Unauthorized APKs Dishonest affiliates often create and distribute unauthorized APKs to attract users and once the user installs such APK, it triggers fraudulent actions in the background without any real engagement. Let’s know how illegitimate APKs cause device fraud –  Hidden Clicks and Install Triggers: The modified APK silently fires click or install signals in the background, making it appear as if the user interacted with your affiliate program, even when they didn’t.  Impact – This causes fake installs and compromised user journey, ultimately draining ad budgets and damaging brand integrity.  Device ID Manipulation and Spoofing Fake or recycled device IDs are used to impersonate multiple “new” users. Fraudsters change or spoof device identifiers to give the impression of invalid traffic as real.  Impact – It inflates user volumes and causes brands to pay for fake installs and engagement that never came from real users.  Device farm fraud It happens when fraudsters set up a room full of smartphones sometimes hundreds or thousands and control them either manually or through bots to fake activities through bots like clicks, installs, or app engagement. Because these devices are real phones, the activity looks legitimate, but it’s just a farm of phones pretending to be real users.  Impact – It creates the illusion of real user engagement and in-app activity.  Clear Signs You Are Experiencing Device Fraud  If as a brand, you investigate your campaign metrics, following are the clear signs you can see to spot device fraud –  Abnormal click-to-install times: Installs happen too quickly or too slowly, suggesting fake or automated activity.    The above graph indicates time (in seconds) on the x-axis and install rate on the y-axis. Based on the 7-days analysis, this graph shows the same repeated pattern where install rate peaks during the time window of 60-120 seconds and decreases as the time increases. The CTIT distribution is functioning on the same pattern for 7 consecutive days which cannot be possible in the case of human interaction; hence it’s a clear indication of bot activity.  Same device signatures across affiliates: Multiple partners show traffic from the same devices, a sign of emulators or reused fingerprints.  Too good to be true ratios: If your click-to-install ratio suddenly outperforms your SRNs or shows unusually high numbers, it’s likely not strong performance, its the suspicious activity pretending to be success.  Recycled or clustered IPs: The same IPs show up again and again, pointing to proxy networks or fake device farms.  Zero post-install engagement: Users install but don’t do anything afterward, showing they’re likely not real users.  The Core Problem: Marketers Evaluate on Averages, Not Validation  Many marketers rely on blended or average performance metrics to judge their affiliate program, but averages hide the truth. Strong affiliates mask the poor quality of others, allowing fraud, fake traffic, and low-intent users to slip through unnoticed.  Instead of looking at overall numbers, marketers need to evaluate each affiliate individually, validating their traffic quality, device signals, and conversion behavior. Only then can they clearly see who drives real value and who drains budgets.  End-to-End Ad Traffic Validation That Looks Deeper Than Average  As the tactics of fraudsters are becoming more sophisticated, ad fraud detection tool like mFilterIt’s Valid8 has become a necessity for brands to ensure their affiliate programs deliver right results.   Valid8 performs in-depth analysis of 10+ device parameters at the same time to check user validity by simultaneously covering –  Source-Level Device Transparency Get complete visibility into the devices each traffic source is sending including device IDs, fingerprints, IPs and unusual click patterns so you can clearly differentiate between real users and suspicious device activity.  Detection of Incent-Driven Device Farms Identify clusters of devices that behave the same way, come from the same IP blocks, or show unnatural install pattern through incentives, automation, or simulators.  Device Integrity Verification Evaluate whether a device is genuine by checking indicators such as emulators, simulators or   to check abnormal behavior flows, or mismatched fingerprints, ensuring only trusted devices are counted.  Actionable, Device-Level Reporting Access detailed insights for every device interacting with your campaigns, enabling you to block bad actors, optimize real traffic sources, and take precise actions instead of broad, guess-based decisions.  Conclusion  Device fraud is not always loud and obvious. It makes healthy campaigns appear underwhelming and causing brands to question their own strategies. But once you understand what’s happening at the device level, the picture becomes much clearer. Most marketers don’t have a performance problem; they have a visibility problem.  With the right ad fraud detection tool like Valid8, marketers can move from guessing to knowing and validating every click, every install, every device, and every affiliate.  The right validation can save your ROAS by 30%. Schedule a 1:1 meeting to know more  FAQs  1. What is the most common type of device fraud? The most common type of device fraud is device ID manipulation, where fraudsters continuously fake or rotate mobile device identifiers to make one device appear as hundreds of unique users. This lets them generate fake clicks, installs, and app activity that look legitimate on the surface.   2. How to identify device fraud? You can identify click fraud by looking for red flags such as   High clicks with low conversions 

Device Fraud in Affiliate Marketing: How Traffic Validation Restores 30% ROAS Read More »

How Do You Stop Brand Bidding by Affiliates

How to Stop Brand Bidding by Affiliates? Can Standard Marketing Tools Track This?

Blog, Affiliate /

“I have a bunch of shady affiliates bidding on our brand search keywords. Every time I ban them, they come back with a new account. I spend hours searching manually on incognito windows, geo-switching, digging URLs, and still miss half of them. Meanwhile, the CAC for our brand keywords keeps rising for no real reason, draining budget and even hijacking our organic traffic.” Many marketers find themselves stuck in this exhausting loop: ban one affiliate for bidding on your brand terms… only to see them resurface under a new account the next day. Despite hours spent checking different SERPs, tracing URLs, or monitoring CPC fluctuations, a significant portion of this brand bidding still goes undetected.  What makes this even more frustrating is the common belief that traditional marketing, analytics, or visibility tools can solve the problem. They can’t — at least not at the level required to stop affiliates who rotate accounts, cloak redirects, or trigger ads only in specific regions. These tools were never built to detect this kind of behaviour, which is why the issue keeps reappearing, no matter how deep you dig.  This blog breaks down why SEO tools fall short, how dedicated affiliate monitoring bridges that gap with real-time, source-level visibility, and includes a real case example to illustrate what truly effective detection looks like in practice. Whether you’re dealing with rising branded CPCs, unexplained CAC spikes, or recurring brand keyword hijacking, this detailed blog will help you understand what’s happening and what actually works to stop it.   Understanding The Problem: Why Affiliates Bid on Your Brand Search Keywords? Affiliates bid on brand keywords for one simple reason – to divert organic users from their links, stealing the attribution of a traffic source that was directly coming to your brand’s website.  Your brand terms cost less, are high-intent, and convert far better than generic keywords. This makes an easy shortcut technique for affiliates to boost their numbers without putting in real effort. Instead of driving genuine incremental traffic, they piggyback on the demand you’ve already created through your own marketing.   Here’s why it gets even more difficult to detect affiliate brand bidding:  Affiliates rarely use one stable link. They create multiple domains, subdomains, sub-IDs, and tracking variations to stay undetected.  They rotate multiple accounts quickly. Even if you ban one, another pops up immediately exhausting marketers trying to track these fake accounts.  They trigger most ads only when you are not looking, like during night hours, in specific cities, and on certain devices, timing chosen to avoid manual detection.  Affiliates scale brand bidding activities aggressively during high-demand periods (sales, launches, festive shopping windows) when the value of each conversion is higher to earn more payouts.  The result? Rising CPCs and higher CAC. And unless you have visibility into every link and every identity behind the ads, the cycle continues.  Get a deeper understanding of affiliate fraud. Explore our complete guide for marketers.  Can Standard Marketing & Analytics Tools Track Affiliate Brand Bidding Violations? The standard marketing tools cannot detect brand bidding violations. They can provide signals based on data, but miss the kind of visibility required to ensure enforcement and affiliate compliance in search campaigns.  What traditional marketing and analytics tools can detect? Shows which domains or advertisers appear in your auction over time.  Provide historical ad copies and landing-page snapshots when captured during routine crawls.  Reveal keyword-level insights such as search share, impression trends, and estimated spend.  Help you understand broad auction dynamics and track competitors running stable, long-term campaigns.  These insights are useful for market visibility and strategy, but they only reflect a portion of what’s happening.  What traditional marketing and analytics tools cannot detect?  Affiliates don’t follow a stable pattern for brand bidding abuse. It is fast, fragmented, and intentionally designed to stay hidden. Here’s what they miss:  Cannot monitor brand bidding violations in real time.  Fail to capture ads targeted to specific geos, devices, or audiences that only some users see.  Don’t identify affiliate sub-IDs, masked redirects, or rotating accounts behind the ads.  Don’t capture thousands of tiny link variations or provide the forensic evidence (screenshots, redirect chains, timestamps) needed to enforce affiliate rules or deny payouts.   Cannot detect cloaking in brand bidding, where a clean page is shown to you, but a redirect is shown to the user.  They don’t track short-lived “burst campaigns” during nights, weekends, or peak sale hours.  Fail to map patterns of affiliate brand bidding abuse, such as repeated offenders switching identities or redirect networks working in clusters.  Why Marketers Need an Advanced Affiliate Monitoring Tool to Detect Brand Bidding?  An advanced AI/ML-based affiliate monitoring tool is specifically built to offer visibility and transparency across all affiliate activities. Here’s what all provides:  Continuously monitors brand keywords across multiple geo locations and devices. 24/7 coverage, not periodic scans.  Detects hidden or time-specific ad triggers. It can catch short bursts and late-night campaigns.  Captures every link and ad variation, even thousands of them. Including tracking parameters, sub-IDs, and UTM permutations.  Identifies the source of each violation by mapping the publisher, sub-publisher, affiliate ID, or the redirect owner behind the ad.  Generates enforceable evidence. Full screenshots, timestamps, and the redirect/log trails that serve as proof.  Alerts you immediately when an unauthorized ad appears. Proactive notifications that allow fast action.  Provide daily/weekly reports for pattern detection. Aggregate findings into actionable intelligence for program decisions and payout validation.  Check out the affiliate monitoring audit checklist every brand needs for fraud-free growth.  Foxtale’s 21% CPC Dropped: How mFilterIt Helped Them Combat Brand Bidding Foxtale, the fast-growing skincare brand, invested heavily in TOF and video campaigns to boost search volumes and drive high-intent users to their website. However, they noticed CPCs were rising on brand search terms by 25–30%, even though demand was strong. Search scalability was getting harder, and ROAS was dropping.  The Challenge Ad networks and affiliates were secretly bidding on Foxtale’s brand terms.  Manual checks barely caught a fraction of what was happening.  High-intent traffic was being hijacked, increasing Foxtale’s acquisition costs. 

How to Stop Brand Bidding by Affiliates? Can Standard Marketing Tools Track This? Read More »

Click Fraud Impacts Performance Campaigns

How Click Fraud Impacts Performance Campaigns in Walled Gardens

Blog, Ad Fraud Blog - Valid8 /

“I’m seeing a surge in clicks on my paid campaigns, but something feels off. The costs are rising, conversions aren’t improving, and a large chunk of my budget is disappearing without any meaningful results. At this point, I’m not even sure if these clicks are from real users—or if competitors, bots, or automated scripts are inflating my numbers and distorting my performance.”  This is a real frustration for marketers investing budgets on ad campaigns to get results. Instead, they challenge like unexpected spikes in clicks, unexplained CPC increases, declining lead quality, and campaign optimizations that simply don’t make sense.  Yet many still assume that only 1–2% of their traffic is invalid.  The data tells a different story. Our analysis of 342 campaigns run in 2024 shows search ads carry close to 10% invalid traffic, while partner networks reach 21%—proving that click fraud inside walled gardens is far more widespread and sophisticated than most expect. On walled gardens, invalid clicks slip through easily. They distort your algorithms, inflate your CPC, clutter remarketing pools, degrade lead quality, and gradually weaken your entire performance funnel.  In this blog, we break down the real impact of click fraud inside walled gardens—and what you can do to protect your budget, your funnel, and your performance from being quietly derailed by fake traffic.  The Real Impact of Fake Clicks on Search Campaigns Walled gardens can filter basic invalid traffic, but sophisticated click fraud still slips through. Modern bots behave like real users—clicking, scrolling, even filling forms—making their activity indistinguishable from genuine engagement.  And this is where the real damage begins. Platforms treat every click as intent. So when fake interactions enter your campaigns, they don’t just waste budget—they mislead algorithms, distort signals, and trigger a chain reaction of poor optimizations.      This domino effect impacts every stage of your search campaigns. The points below break down exactly how invalid traffic quietly reshapes performance, from rising CPC to weakened remarketing and declining lead quality.  Sudden Click Spikes Mislead the Algorithm A sudden rise in clicks may seem like good news, but when those clicks are invalid, they send false demand signals. The algorithm assumes your ad is gaining traction, your audience is responding well, and your targeting is strong. In reality, fake activity steers your campaign in a direction that doesn’t reflect true user intent. Seeing such good numbers, you invest more in your campaign which is already giving you fake ad traffic.   Your CPC Starts Increasing Without Any Logical Reason Once platforms believe your ads are performing well, they push your ads into more competitive auctions. That’s when CPC starts rising. Nothing changes in your targeting, communication, or creatives; it’s simply the result of invalid clicks convincing the system that your ad deserves more aggressive delivery, even though the engagement wasn’t real.  On-Site Behaviour Drops, Impacting Relevancy Scores Invalid clicks land on your website and leave immediately. This results in unnaturally high bounce rates and very short, low-quality sessions. Platforms interpret this behaviour as a relevance issue, due to which your ads lose efficiency; delivery weakens, costs rise further, and even good audiences become harder to reach.  Lead Quality Declines and Sales Teams Feel the Impact The impact of click fraud is not limited only to click stage. The impact begins to show on the entire campaign funnel. Invalid clicks turn into invalid leads through auto-filled forms, fake details, or low-intent submissions. This clutters your CRM and slows down your sales team. Instead of speaking to real prospects, they spend valuable time following up with leads that never had genuine interest or do not even exist. Over time, this pulls down your overall lead-to-opportunity conversion rate. Know more about how to improve landing page traffic and lead quality  Remarketing Performance Drops Due to Click Fraud Invalid users also get added to your remarketing lists. When that happens, you end up retargeting audiences with no intent to convert. Remarketing becomes more expensive and less effective. Even worse, algorithms start learning from these polluted audiences, expanding your reach in the wrong direction and pushing you further away from genuine high-intent users.  Analytics Become Unreliable, Leading to Misleading Optimizations Once invalid clicks affect both initial traffic and remarketing, your analytics start losing accuracy. Conversion paths look unusual, A/B test results become inconsistent, and attribution feels off. Decisions based on this corrupted data lead to incorrect budget shifts, misguided optimizations, and scaling efforts built on signals that don’t reflect real customer behaviour.  Budgets Get Misallocated, Leading to Long-Term Revenue Loss Algorithms keep pushing budget into ad sets, keywords, or audience segments that seem to bring high engagement, but conversions remain poor. Meanwhile, genuinely strong segments may get reduced investment. The longer this goes unnoticed, the more your budget drifts away from real performance drivers. This leads to long-term revenue loss and lower ROAS.  How mFilterIt Helps Advertisers Eliminate Click Fraud and Take Back Control of Their Funnel The problem of click fraud inside walled gardens and search ecosystems cannot be solved with platform filters or surface-level analytics alone. Advertisers need a system that protects their funnel from the very first interaction with real-time visibility, smarter detection, and complete transparency. This is exactly where our ad fraud detection tool – Valid8 serves as a stronger layer of protection against ad fraud. Here’s how it helps:  Proactive click fraud detection to filter out invalid traffic Click fraud causes damage right at the moment it happens. That’s why mFilterIt validates every click proactively, before it reaches your website or influences platform algorithms. This ensures bots, automated interactions, and low-quality clicks are filtered instantly, keeping your CPC stable and your funnel protected from the very beginning.  Source-level transparency – Know if the traffic is bot or genuine Walled gardens don’t reveal much about where clicks come from or how they behave. Our ad fraud solution bridges that gap by providing an independent, transparent view into the source of each click and behavioural pattern, even inside closed platforms. This helps advertisers spot issues

How Click Fraud Impacts Performance Campaigns in Walled Gardens Read More »

brand protection

Why Your Brand Needs An OSINT-powered Brand Protection Tool?

Blog, Brand Protection /

As brands shift further into digital channels, the threats are rising too. These risks reveal an alarming statistic with 3.6 million products getting seized for trademark violations in the MENA region.  Even the most prepared brands are surprised by how fast digital threats evolve. Traditional guardrails provide a foundational protection, but fraudsters are now using AI to fasten the process, which can be missed by manual checks. This doesn’t mean your brand is vulnerable; it simply means it’s the right time to upgrade your protection.  These challenges not just hit your revenue but also impacts your brand reputation, which you had taken years to build. Due to the strict regulatory guidelines for advertisers in the MENA region, it is imperative for brands to ensure that their communication and assets are protected and compliant. Relying solely on manual checks makes it difficult to spot these sophisticated tactics in time.  As the gap between traditional defenses and modern fraud methods continues to grow, only automated brand monitoring tools powered by Open-Source Intelligence can bring back the trust and confidence in digital advertising.  In this blog, you will discover –  The hidden digital threat undermining brand trust in MENA  The impact of ignoring digital brand protection in MENA  From manual checks to real-time visibility  Key takeaways for marketers  Conclusion  Types of Digital Threats Impacting Brands in the MENA region Your digital presence shapes how customers perceive you, locally and globally. However, various hidden threats lie beneath that slowly damage your digital growth. Let’s know them in detail –  Fake websites and brand impersonation Fraudsters create fake websites or illegitimate social media pages of brands. These fake pages often run ads or sell counterfeit products, diverting genuine traffic and damaging customer trust. In regions like the MENA where e-commerce is rapidly expanding at a rapid scale, such impersonation can easily confuse new buyers and erode years of brand credibility.  Trademark infringement There are various unverified resellers or influencers who use various brand assets like logos, product images, or taglines without approval. While it may appear as free promotion, this often leads to misinformation, incorrect pricing, or false discounts being circulated. This generates inconsistent brand messaging, directly impacting the brand’s reputation.  Coupon and affiliate link misuse Unapproved use of the brand’s coupons and affiliate links is one of the fastest growing challenges brands are facing. Fraudulent affiliates leak coupon codes or reuse tracking links across unauthorized platforms, leading to revenue diversion and false attribution. Brands end up paying commissions for organic or direct sales, while real affiliates lose credit for genuine conversions.  Read in detail about various kinds of affiliate fraud  Phishing scams Fraudsters run phishing scams by impersonating trusted brands or people and tricking victims into revealing sensitive information. They send convincing-looking emails, texts, or messages that use brand logos, urgent language, and fake links or attachments that lead to cloned websites or prompt credential entry.  Non-compliant ad content In the MENA region, as norms are tightening, adhering to regulatory guidelines has become a new mandate. If any violation like undisclosed sponsorships or exaggerated claim against regulatory standards, occurs, this can cause hefty penalties and loss of credibility for brands.   Counterfeit product listings Fraudsters list low-quality products in a brand’s name on various e-commerce platforms. This not only steals sales but also damages. Innocent customers who purchase goods assuming them as original ones suffer the most and the blame falls in the brand’s court.    How Brand Infringement Threats Impact Your Brand? Digital brand protection is not just a safeguard from brand infringement threats—it’s a business-critical pillar. Without it, brands may face several consequences:  Loss of consumer trust Due to fraudulent tactics like misleading ads, fake discounts, and counterfeit product listings, customers get tricked and their trust erodes, restricting them to make other purchases from the same brand. Revenue Diversion Fraudsters divert revenue that rightfully belongs to your brand through organic poaching. This not only affects sales but also drains your ad budgets with no real returns. Read in detail about organic poaching Eroded Brand Reputation Misuse or illegitimate use of the brand’s trademarks damages brand’s reputation. Such misuse dilutes your brand identity and creates mixed signals in the market. Compliance Risks In the MENA region, where compliance is the utmost priority for brands, non-compliant campaigns, misleading claims, or lack of mandatory disclosures (like affiliate tagging) expose your brand to regulatory scrutiny. This can lead to legal penalties, public backlash, and long-term reputation damage. Operational Strain Managing take-down requests, legal actions, customer complaints, and reputation recovery consumes significant internal bandwidth. This operational burden distracts teams from growth and innovation.  Why Brands Need an OSINT-powered Brand Protection Tool? Manual monitoring can’t match the scale or speed of modern fraud. That’s why it’s essential to adopt advanced solutions like mFilterIt’s digital brand protection solution, Sentinel+, which enables brands to stay in control without constant manual effort.  Omni Channel coverage Monitors unauthorized brand use or impersonation across websites, marketplaces, and social channels to instantly spot fake websites, impersonation pages, counterfeit listings, and unauthorized use of your brand assets. Early detection ensures quick action before these threats mislead consumers or damage your brand. Flagging non-compliant content Identifies misleading or non-compliant content that could result in reputational or regulatory damage. By scanning ads, listings, posts, and promotions, your brand can catch false claims, unapproved creatives, and missing disclosures. This prevents misinformation from spreading and protects your brand from legal exposure. Affiliate performance track Tracks affiliate and partner activity to ensure fair attribution and prevent fraudulent promotions through continuous monitoring of how affiliates are promoting your brand, making it easy to flag suspicious traffic patterns, coupon misuse, hidden redirects, or inflated conversions. This ensures affiliates are rewarded fairly and fraudsters are kept out. Real-time Visibility Safeguards brand equity by continuously monitoring where and how your brand is represented online, maintaining consistent and accurate brand messaging across channels. It ensures that every touchpoint—from product listings to influencer posts reflects your brand guidelines and strengthens your market presence. Enhancing customer trust Protects consumer

Why Your Brand Needs An OSINT-powered Brand Protection Tool? Read More »

Why Affiliate Compliance Monitoring is Important

Affiliate Compliance Monitoring: Why It’s Crucial for Every Brand

Blog, Affiliate /

When Affiliate Compliance Slips, Your Brand Pays the Price  Imagine a fast-growing e-commerce brand launching a seasonal campaign and partnering with multiple affiliates to boost sales and drive conversions. Within days, traffic spiked, a good sign, they thought. But behind the surge, unapproved coupon sites and cashback platforms had picked up leaked affiliate links and were redirecting genuine shoppers through their own tracking URLs.  The outcome? Brand lost tens of thousands in false payouts, its conversion data became unreliable, and customers began distrusting its discounts.  What looked like campaign success was actually affiliate fraud draining ROI and damaging brand credibility, a reminder that without strict affiliate compliance monitoring, even genuine performance marketing can backfire.  In this blog, we will discover –  The growing need for affiliate marketing compliance  Common affiliate compliance violations  Why are affiliate policy violations difficult to detect?   How mFilterIt’s compliance monitoring model protects brand integrity  Role of technology in strengthening compliance  Benefits of holistic compliance monitoring  Conclusion  The Growing Need for Affiliate Compliance The affiliate ecosystem is vast and goes far beyond direct affiliate partnerships. It includes sub-affiliates, affiliate networks, influencers, review platforms, coupon sites, and other partners that help drive traffic and sales. With so many layers involved, every interaction plays a role in shaping how a brand is represented. This makes it essential for brands to ensure that each affiliate partner follows their ethical standards, maintains consistent messaging, and complies with brand and industry specific advertising regulations to protect both performance and brand reputation.  When affiliates don’t follow a brand’s guidelines, it opens the door to miscommunication for the users, leading from misleading claims, wrong messaging, and suspicious links. This can lead to penalties from regulatory bodies, damaging the brand’s reputation, and wasting valuable ad spend. Common Affiliate Compliance Violations Undermining Brand Integrity The common violations of affiliate compliance sneak in, giving you the illusion of inflated metrics. Let’s know what these violations look like –  Fake Performance and Attribution Manipulation  Some dishonest affiliates use deceptive tactics to make their campaigns appear successful. Techniques like cookie stuffing and click spamming target your organic users, stealing credit for installs or purchases that were already going to happen. On top of this, advanced methods like click injection trigger fake clicks just moments before a real user completes an install, tricking the system into awarding last-click attribution to the fraudster. This causes genuine affiliates to lose credit leading to wasted ad spend and inflated metrics Unauthorized Social Media Promotions Sometimes affiliates use brand creatives on their own social media handles with same or exaggerated offers and false discounts that are not approved by brands, to clickbait users. This might trigger the number of clicks or install rate too but questions the brand’s credibility and trust within customers. When customers feel misled, they often blame the brand, not the affiliate. Brand Bidding Violations Some affiliates bid on your branded keywords to appear above your official website, thereby diverting the organic traffic as paid traffic. Unapproved Regional Promotions Some affiliates run campaigns in restricted regions, ignoring ad disclosure rules or violating data privacy regulations, causing legal troubles. These violations can cause serious legal troubles for brands. Coupon frauds Affiliates use expired or fake discount codes to attract users and claim commissions on genuine sales, leading to revenue loss and customer mistrust. Typo squatting Fraudsters create look-alike domains with slight spelling errors to redirect users and steal affiliate credit meant for legitimate partners. For example, using ‘gooogle.com’ instead of ‘google.com.’ Referral fraud It happens when dishonest affiliates manipulate a referral program through fake referrals using bots or duplicate accounts to earn rewards without bringing real users or sales. Why are Affiliate Policy Violations Difficult to Detect? Complex Affiliate Hierarchies Affiliate network is based on a complex ecosystem that makes it hard for brands to trace where traffic truly originates from. Fraudulent activities often hide behind legitimate affiliates, masking non-compliant behavior. Lack of Source-level visibility Without automated monitoring across networks, brands often detect violations only after damage has occurred. This delay allows bad actors to profit before being caught. Manual Audits can’t match scale With thousands of clicks, installs, and conversions happening, especially during the peak seasons, manual checks become too slow to identify these compliance violations as they possess limited ability to catch every policy breach in time. Tangible Business Benefits of Compliance Monitoring Implementing strong affiliate compliance monitoring delivers measurable business value beyond fraud prevention.  Improved ROI By filtering out fraudulent or low-quality traffic through affiliate monitoring tools, brands can direct budgets toward genuine affiliates and high-performing channels, ensuring every dollar spent drives real results. This enables them to stay compliant to brand guidelines and secure their digital assets as well. Brand Protection Compliance monitoring safeguards your brand’s reputation by preventing misuse of logos, creatives, and messaging. It ensures your brand is represented accurately and ethically across all touchpoints. Market Competitiveness With advanced compliance tools, brands can act with vigilance, stay compliant with its guidelines and regional policies, and maintain a trustworthy online presence, gaining a competitive edge in a crowded marketplace. mFilterIt’s Affiliate Compliance Violation Monitoring: How does it work? When brands struggle to maintain affiliate compliance, the risk goes beyond simple brand guideline violations; it can deeply harm brand assets, reputation, and customer trust. mFilterIt’s robust affiliate monitoring tool not only tracks and analyses affiliate performance but also safeguards brand integrity. Let’s know how –  Prevent Brand Bidding Stop affiliates from bidding on your brand keywords in paid search, protecting both your organic traffic and ad spend. Detect IP Violations & Typo-squatting Identify unauthorized domains or lookalike websites using your brand name to mislead customers. Track In-Store Product Mentions Use advanced extensions to monitor how your in-store or offline products are promoted online by affiliates. Counterfeit Products Find and remove duplicate product pages that confuse customers and dilute genuine sales. Avoid Brand Misrepresentation Detect false claims, misleading content, or inaccurate product details that can harm brand credibility. Stop Coupon Code Misuse Identify unapproved coupon sharing and

Affiliate Compliance Monitoring: Why It’s Crucial for Every Brand Read More »

Affiliate Fraud in MENA

How Affiliate Fraud Impacts White Friday Sales for MENA Brands & How to Combat

Blog, Ad Fraud /

White Friday (as known in the Middle East region) is one of the high-growth periods for brands as consumer intent peaks; competition intensifies, and digital storefronts battle for attention across marketplaces, apps, and social platforms. Users aren’t just browsing; they’re ready to act, which means every click, every install, and every new registration matters.  To capture this surge, brands often scale up their affiliate campaigns to reach as many new users as possible.   In 2024, over 25% of White Friday sales in the MENA region were attributed to affiliate platforms and stores, underscoring how crucial the affiliate marketing channel has become for driving app installs, user sign-ups, and purchases.  However, while this model promises measurable results, it also comes with greater risks.   While the advertisers race to capitalize this high sale season during White Friday with affiliate partnerships, some are ready to exploit it. Some affiliates resort to manipulative tactics that distort data, steal attribution credit for organic users, and drain budgets.   Therefore, it becomes time-critical for brands in the MENA region to validate their ad traffic coming from affiliate marketing, to ensure that every click, install, and interaction results in positive outcomes.   How Affiliate Fraud Spikes During White Friday Sales in MENA The sales skyrocket during White Friday and fraudulent affiliates use this as an opportunity to deploy fake traffic, device emulators, and various affiliate fraud techniques to mimic real users and claim payouts.  Industry data reveals global mobile app install fraud exposure surged 157% to reach $5.4 billion, with bots driving over 70% of this activity. In the MENA region alone, affiliate and install fraud exposure was estimated at $65 million in 2023, impacting categories like travel, finance, and shopping apps.  Here are some of the sophisticated forms of ad fraud techniques used by affiliates to manipulate campaign results:  1. Click Injection Fraudsters generate fake clicks seconds before a legitimate app install, hijacking attribution from genuine users.  2. Incent Fraud Where fraudulent affiliates run ads on incent walls to drive traffic and encourage them to take action against a reward. Usually, in this case, the traffic is genuine but low intent. They uninstall the app once they have claimed the reward, and the brand has to pay double to acquire new users.    3. Click Spamming It is when fraud affiliates generate a large number of fake clicks in the background of a mobile ad to manipulate attribution systems, steal credits for genuine user installs and falsely claim payouts.  4. Coupon Fraud Affiliates often misuse promo codes, run fake or unapproved offers under the legit brand name to inflate conversion numbers and earn payouts.  5. Device Farms Virtual devices simulate installs and in-app activity, creating the illusion of organic user growth.  6. SDK Spoofing SDK spoofing is another sophisticated method of ad fraud where fraudsters imitate legitimate app install signals by manipulating the SDK’s communication with attribution platforms. This tricks systems into recording fake installs, inflating metrics, and wasting ad spend.  These fraudulent signals blend effortlessly with legitimate traffic, making detection far more difficult.  The consequences are immediate and costly – affecting marketing ROI.   Brands end up paying for fake users instead of real customers, losing not just money, but also the data integrity needed for smarter campaign decisions. And during White Friday, the problem intensifies because the higher the spend, the deeper the loss.  Yet, much of MENA’s affiliate ecosystem still operates on trust-based relationships and loosely vetted publisher networks, leaving brands vulnerable to hidden fraud patterns that traditional ad fraud solutions fail to catch.  How Affiliate Fraud Impacts Business Growth During White Friday Sales When affiliate fraud goes undetected, it affects more than just numbers; it directly impacts your budget, performance, and long-term growth. Here’s how:  Wasted ad spend – You unknowingly end up paying for fake clicks, fake installs, or in-app actions that never come from real users.  Low user quality – Techniques like incent fraud bring in users who install the app but don’t stay or engage, leading to quick drop-offs and poor LTV.  False performance reports – Affiliate fraud makes campaigns look profitable on paper, even when they’re not delivering real results.  Wrong partner credit – Genuine affiliates lose recognition, while fraudulent ones get paid for work they didn’t do ethically. This also makes it difficult for marketers to figure out where to invest for real growth.  Compromised retargeting budgets – Advertisers end up running re-engagement campaigns for fake users by feeding wrong data to the algorithms, wasting budget on audiences that don’t exist.  Understand the real impact of ad fraud on MENA brands in detail here. Why Detection Using Attribution Platforms Isn’t Enough: The Need for Advanced App Traffic Validation Marketers still rely on attribution platforms and analytics tools to detect suspicious activity and affiliate fraud. However, they often ignore the fact that fraudsters have now become smarter and use multi-layered techniques to manipulate campaign data, fake results, and earn payouts.   Fraudsters now use automation, spoofed devices, and fabricated user signals to mimic legitimate user behaviour so closely that they pass through standard detection filters unnoticed.  So, what marketers need now is not another fraud alert or detection system; they need a proactive ad traffic validation solution. Because validation helps restore what detection alone cannot — trust.  Here’s how advanced ad traffic validation and affiliate fraud detection tools add real value to affiliate campaigns:  Validates every click, install, and post-install event to confirm they come from real users, ensuring the right partner receives credit.  Identifies fraudulent activity like click injection, click spamming, or SDK spoofing that often go undetected in attribution dashboards.  Helps remove misleading traffic signals from future campaigns, giving marketers a clear and reliable view of performance.  Helps advertisers optimize spend by directing budgets toward affiliates driving authentic, high-quality installs.  With validated insights, brands can make confident optimization decisions backed by trusted data.  Transparent, validated reporting builds accountability between brands, publishers, and partners.  To explore in detail why attribution tools alone can’t stop mobile ad fraud – read

How Affiliate Fraud Impacts White Friday Sales for MENA Brands & How to Combat Read More »

Affiliate Fraud in USA

Holiday Safety Playbook for Marketers Spending on Affiliates

Guide, Ad Traffic Validation /

The holiday season is the biggest time for the year when campaigns scale fast, budgets expand, and every click counts. Brands prepare months in advance to capture the surge in consumer intent, aiming to convert festive enthusiasm into measurable ROI.  Affiliate marketing campaigns play a key role in this strategy, with brands amplifying their reach, boosting app installs, and attracting high-intent shoppers through affiliate partnerships.  In fact, the US affiliate market is valued at 11.53 billion in 2025 and is anticipated to grow at CAGR of 11.08%. This explosive growth shows how integral affiliate partnerships have become for digital marketing success, connecting brands with millions of potential customers.  But with scale comes risk. As affiliate traffic surges, so does the volume of invalid or fraudulent activity that hides within it. Many brands see higher traffic but unchanged conversions, a clear signal that all that “activity” isn’t coming from real users. That’s where ad traffic validation at all levels becomes essential.  In this guide, we will cover –  What is affiliate fraud?  Impact of affiliate fraud during the holiday season How can full-funnel ad traffic validation safeguard brand this holiday season?  Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)  Conclusion  What is Affiliate Fraud?  Affiliate fraud is when some affiliates perform any illegitimate activity to drive up numbers and generate commission from the inflated metrics. It spoils the campaign metrics and ROAS, especially during the holiday season, when it matters the most. This can occur due to any method of fraud, including fake leads, repeated leads, etc.   How Holiday Affiliate Fraud Impacts Performance   Affiliate fraud spikes during the holiday season as both customer activity and affiliate partnerships surge, with brands competing to capture maximum attention. Let’s look at how this impacts affiliate marketing campaigns and the common types of fraud that tend to peak during this time.  1. Surge in Budgets and Campaign Volume a. Why fraud rises: During the holidays, brands spend more and launch bigger campaigns. With so much traffic and so many clicks coming in, it becomes easier for fraudsters to hide fake activity.  b. Common fraud types: Fake clicks (known as click spamming or click injection), and brand keyword hijacking.  c. How it happens: Fraudsters use bots or click farms to generate thousands of fake clicks or inject clicks just before a real app install, stealing credit from genuine affiliates. Some even bid on your brand name in search ads to capture users looking for you.  d. Impact: Brands end up paying for fake traffic, face inflated costs per click (CPC), and see misleading data on engagement and conversions, paying more but getting less real performance.  2. Rush to Onboard New Affiliates a. Why fraud rises: As brands try to scale fast, they onboard new affiliates quickly, sometimes without proper checks. Fraudsters use this rush to sneak in as “legit” partners.  b. Common fraud types: Coupon misuse, referral fraud, fake conversions, and brand keyword hijacking.  c. How it happens: New or unverified affiliates may create multiple fake accounts, share discount codes widely, or run unauthorized ads using your brand name.   d. Impact: You end up paying fraudulent commissions, your CPC spikes unexpectedly, and your brand message appears in places you never approved.  Read in detail about referral and coupon fraud  3. Incentive-Driven Campaigns Become Fraud Magnets a. Why fraud rises: High cashback offers, discounts, or referral bonuses attract not just customers but also opportunists.  b. Common fraud types: Coupon fraud, referral fraud, and fake conversions.  c. How it happens: Fraudsters or bots create fake accounts to repeatedly use referral links or coupon codes. Some even set up “install farms” to fake app installs just to earn rewards.  d. Impact: You attract a flood of low-quality users who rarely return, damaging long-term retention and skewing your success metrics.  4. Attribution Manipulation Peaks a. Why fraud rises: Holiday campaigns offer higher payouts, so fraudsters compete to take credit for the “last click” that leads to a conversion.  b. Common fraud types: Click injection, and click spamming, also organic hijacking  c. How it happens: Fraudsters trigger fake clicks right before a user installs your app, making it look like they caused the conversion.  d. Impact: Real affiliates lose credit, your optimization decisions become inaccurate, and marketing spend shifts toward bad traffic sources.  5. More Sophisticated Automation Attacks a. Why fraud rises: Fraudsters use advanced bots that can imitate real users during high-traffic seasons.  b. Common fraud types: Fake clicks, fake signups, and automated referral abuse.  c. How it happens: They use tools like “headless browsers” (bots that act like real browsers without showing a screen) or emulators to mimic user actions like clicking ads or filling forms.  d. Impact: Your analytics fill with fake data, increasing payouts to dishonest affiliates and making performance reports unreliable.  6. Masked Fraud in High Volumes a. Why fraud rises: When traffic surges during the holidays, small signs of fraud easily get lost in the mix.  b. Common fraud types: All types, especially coupon/referral abuse and click spam.  c. How it happens: Fraudsters mix fake traffic with genuine visitors or spread out fake clicks over time to avoid detection tools. d. Impact: Fraud becomes harder to spot manually and slowly eats away at your budget and performance metrics.  7. Limited Time to Validate Data a. Why fraud rises: Fraud is no longer a black-and-white issue, and reviewing every click or conversion isn’t practical. Dishonest affiliates often blend legitimate traffic with incentivized fraud and organic hijacking, which are the real human interactions that show activity but no genuine intent to convert.  b. Common fraud types: Incent fraud and organic hijacking  c. How it happens: Fraudsters push fake activity in short bursts, ensuring they get paid before the fraud is discovered.  d. Impact: You end up getting non-genuine users who lead to wasted ad spend, skewed performance data, and lower overall campaign ROI.  How does mFilterIt’s Ad Fraud Detection Tool help Brands during Holiday Season?   To fight affiliate fraud effectively, brands need to validate ad traffic across the entire funnel, ensuring

Holiday Safety Playbook for Marketers Spending on Affiliates Read More »

A Brand Protection Solution

8 Questions You Need To Ask While Considering A Brand Protection Solution

Blog, Brand Protection /

According to a recent study by Menlo Security, 51% of browser-based phishing attempts involved some form of brand impersonation. Moreover, cybercriminals created nearly 1 million new phishing sites each month, a 700% increase since 2020.  This means, fake websites, counterfeit listings, social media impersonations, and trademark infringements are multiplying faster than ever – stealing traffic, revenue, digital identity, and most importantly, trust.  But what’s more alarming is how these threats are evolving with the emergence of AI.   Fraudsters now use AI-generated content, automation, and deepfakes to create near-perfect replicas of brand assets – from product images to verified social media profiles in just minutes. What once took days of manual setup can now be executed at a scale with minimal human effort.  Unfortunately, many brands are still fighting these modern threats with outdated methods. Some rely on manual monitoring and basic takedowns that can’t match the speed of AI-powered fraud. Others invest in single-channel protection, monitoring only marketplaces or social media, leaving other digital fronts completely exposed.  Now brand infringement threats are not linear but takes place across multiple touchpoints; therefore, brands need to have complete visibility across all those touchpoints.   This brings us to a critical question every brand must ask:  How do you choose the right brand protection solution, one that’s built for today’s evolving digital threats and not yesterday’s challenges?  In this blog, we’ll walk through the 7 key questions every business should ask before selecting a brand protection tool, and what you should expect in return if you want true, end-to-end protection for your brand.  8 Questions to Ask While Choosing a Brand Protection Solution  Choosing a brand protection solution isn’t just about buying another security tool; it’s about choosing the right partner to safeguard your brand’s identity, trust, and customer relationships.  1. Does it offer omnichannel visibility and scalable protection? Your brand is visible across multiple platforms – from marketplaces and social media to search engines, mobile apps, paid ads, and third-party websites. Every digital touchpoint is part of your brand’s identity and customer experience, and each of these are an entry point for fraudsters.   A fake listing on a marketplace, a cloned website running paid ads, or an impersonated social media page can all damage customer trust in minutes.   That’s why a truly effective brand protection solution must provide omnichannel visibility, not just monitoring one or two platforms, but continuously scanning the entire digital ecosystem where your brand interacts with customers. It should detect misuse across ecommerce platforms, social networks, search ads, domains, video content, and app stores, giving you a single, unified view of every potential risk.  2. Does it use AI, ML, and OSINT to detect sophisticated threats? Modern brand infringement threats are not just limited to creating fake websites or misuse of brand logos. It has evolved and become more sophisticated with the emergence of AI. Now create deepfakes of reputed celebrities, or ads, using just a few prompts. In case of investment firms, it expands to promotions of fake investment schemes, stock recommendations, etc. The solution must be able to identify all types of brand infringements across platforms.   It should combine AI, ML, and Open source intelligence to enable wide-net scanning across the open web, marketplaces, social platforms, and even hidden channels, detecting brand infringements that might otherwise go undetected.   3. Can it detect lookalike brand impersonations and not just exact copies? Fraudsters have now moved beyond just replicating exact copies of brand websites or other assets. They now create lookalike versions by slightly altering a domain name, tweaking a logo color, or mimicking your writing style, to deceive customers while staying under the radar.  An advanced brand protection solution should be equipped with visual similarity detection, linguistic analysis, and pattern-recognition algorithms that go beyond exact-match searches. These technologies help identify deceptive variations such as “amaz0n.com” instead of “amazon.com” or fake profiles that reuse brand imagery with subtle alterations. 4. How accurate and actionable are the insights?  Digital threats evolve fast, and threat detection and identification are only useful when they lead to clear, actionable outcomes. When assessing a brand protection solution, you need to look at the accuracy of its detection engine, how effectively it separates genuine threats from noise.   The right solution should offer risk scoring, prioritization and real-time proofs, helping your compliance team act faster on high-impact threats. The focus should be on precision, not volume, ensuring your enforcement team spends time removing real threats, not reviewing false positives.  5. Can it take swift and successful takedown actions? Detection is only helpful when the action against the infringement is taken fast. An effective brand protection tool should not only identify infringements but also remove them effectively.  When evaluating a tool, ask how fast the system moves from detection to enforcement.   Do they have pre-established partnerships with marketplaces, social media platforms, and domain registrars to speed up takedowns?   Are their processes automated, or will your team need to raise manual requests each time?   How much time does it take to enforce a takedown?  The right solution should offer faster resolution once an infringement is detected. It should also be equipped with automated escalation workflows backed by legal and compliance expertise. End-to-end visibility, so you can track every enforcement action from detection to resolution, ensuring 24/7 protection and preserving your brand reputation before any violation causes lasting damage.  6. Can the solution adapt to your industry’s unique challenges? Every industry and every brand has its own unique challenges and might face distinct infringement patterns. Luxury brands deal with more counterfeit cases, while financial brands face more phishing scams or investment fraud. On the other hand, FMCG brands might face issues like similar packaging products being sold by resellers, etc.   Therefore, the ideal brand protection solution must be able to cater to your specific requirements. Ask the provider whether the tool tailors its detection models, risk thresholds, and reporting to your industry-specific needs. Also, ask for real client case studies or testimonials to

8 Questions You Need To Ask While Considering A Brand Protection Solution Read More »

Scroll to Top