mFilterIt
Contact Us
mfilterit

Mobile Ad Fraud

install fraud

What is Install Fraud? How to Solve Install Fraud?

Blog, Mobile Ad Fraud /

Advertising platforms optimize for signals—not intent.   In mobile marketing, the most important signal is the install. More installs usually mean a campaign is working. Platforms see this, assume success, and push more budget in the same direction.   This is where install fraud begins.   Fake installs are easier and cheaper to generate than real users. Fraudsters use bots, device farms, or incentivized tactics to create large volumes of installs that look genuine on the surface. Since the numbers look good, platforms assume the campaign is performing well. Budgets increase. The same sources get more spend.   But the users aren’t real.   At first, nothing feels wrong. Cost per install may even go down. Install numbers keep growing. The problem only becomes visible later, when users don’t open the app, don’t register, and don’treturn. What looked like growth turns into wasted spend.   That’s why fake app installs are so hard to catch early. It doesn’t break campaigns overnight. It quietly trains platforms to invest in fake activity while genuine users get pushed out.   In this blog, we’ll explain what install fraud is, the common ways it happens, and how marketers can spot and prevent it—before it starts impacting real growth.  What is Install Fraud in Mobile Advertising?  Install fraud occurs when fake app installs are generated or manipulated to claim attribution and payouts, without real user intent.  In simple terms, a fake install appears as a genuine app download on your dashboard but doesn’t come from a genuine user who intends to engage with your app. These installs may be created by bots, emulators, manipulated devices, or deceptive techniques designed to game attribution systems.  Install fraud falls under the broader category of mobile ad fraud, and it primarily targets CPI-driven campaigns. Since advertisers pay for installs, fraudsters focus on triggering that one event, regardless of what happens afterwards.  What makes this problem more complex is that modern mobile ad fraud techniques don’t just stop at installs. When install traffic isn’t verified, the same fraudulent activity extends to post-install events as well, such as sign-ups, in-app actions, or other action-driven KPIs. These events may look legitimate in reports, but they’re often designed to reinforce false performance signals.  The result? You end up paying for volume, but you don’t get real value in return, leading to weaker optimization signals and campaign inefficiency.  Common Types of Install Fraud Techniques You Need to Know About  Fraudsters use various techniques to generate fake installs and manipulate last-click attribution. These techniques closely mimic real user activity, making it impossible for basic tools to identifymobile ad fraud. Here are the most common install fraud techniques performance marketers should be familiar with:  Click Injection Click injection happens when a fraudulent source identifies that an install is about to take place. A click is fired right at that moment (by exploiting the narrow attribution window) to steal the last click attribution from the channel that actually drove the install. This is also known as organic poaching or install hijacking.  Click Spamming Click spamming is when a large volume of fake ad clicks are sent and injected into devices in advance. This increases the chance that one of those clicks gets credited whenever an organic install eventually takes place, stealing the attribution as a result.  SDK Spoofing SDK spoofing fakes app installs by imitating devices and app signals through emulators or scripts, making it appear as a real user installed on the app, without any actual download taking place.Fraudsters generate installs only to exhaust advertising budgets and spoof installs.  Fake App Versions Fraudsters use altered or cloned versions of the app that appear legitimate but generate fake installs and in-app events. These versions mimic normal activity and deceive attribution systems into counting non-genuine traffic.  Know what unusual app version patterns look like and how they reveal bot traffic.  What makes all these techniques dangerous is not just how they work but also how normal they appear to human eyes in standard reports.  How Does Install Fraud Impact Mobile Advertising Performance? Install fraud operates silently. It passes basic attribution checks, mimics normal install behaviour, and avoids sudden spikes that might raise alarms. This happens because installs are counted before user quality is proven.   The moment an install is attributed, it’s treated as success, long before anyone knows whether that user will engage, return, or convert. Therefore, the business impact begins to fall. It doesn’tjust affect one metric or one campaign. It spreads across attribution, the entire funnel, optimization, teams, and long-term strategy. Here’s how:  Confusing performance metrics Fake installs inflate metrics like CPI and install volume, masking real weaknesses in retention, engagement, and long-term value.  Misleading attribution signals & optimization decisions Mobile ad fraud techniques steal credit from genuine channels, making fraudulent partners look better than they truly are, leading teams to invest where value isn’t being created.  Lower audience quality Fake installs never engage meaningfully post-install. When these users enter retargeting lists or lookalike pools, overall audience quality drops.  Budget misallocation Because dashboards don’t always show red flags early, money keeps flowing toward channels that appear efficient but deliver little real return.  Cross-team impact Product, growth, and analytics teams end up working with skewed signals, affecting feature prioritization, engagement strategy, and user journey decisions.  Unreliable forecasting and planning Cohort trends, lifetime value projections, and performance forecasts become unreliable when they’re built on compromised data.  Skewed event-level analysis Low-intent users trigger surface-level actions, making it appear as though users are progressing through the funnel. This skews event-level analysis, weakens action-driven KPIs, and makes it harder to identify where genuine drop-offs are actually happening.  But my attribution platforms flag mobile ad fraud? Most attribution platforms are designed to assign credit, not to validate whether an install or event came from real user intent. As a result, sophisticated mobile ad fraud techniques manipulate attribution logic, steal credit from genuine channels, and reinforce false performance signals. This often leads teams to trust reports that look complete, but miss the underlying quality and

What is Install Fraud? How to Solve Install Fraud? Read More »

Bot Traffic Spotted

Bot Technique Spotted: How Unusual App Version Patterns Signal Bot Traffic & Fake Installs

Blog, Mobile Ad Fraud /

One of the common pain points our clients have expressed is that their number of installs doesn’t match the number of conversions. They see a high volume of installs happening, but this doesn’t convert into outcomes.   There is not just one reason behind an unusual spike in installs. It can be bots, or something more advanced which a human eye might miss easily. In one of a recent campaign data we evaluated, we observed that a new and unusual technique is used to hide invalid traffic driving fake app installs from Android mobile versions.   In the sections ahead, we’ll break down how fraudsters are hiding their trails by spoofing device related information – like mobile app versions and why it matters more than you think.   What We Found: Unusual App Version Patterns at Device-Level Validation Real Android applications follow a consistent version structure that looks like 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.3 (dots/separators placed at the bottom).  However, malicious application versions or bot-generated installs fail to replicate this accurately. These unusual app version patterns appear as 3·1·1, 3·1·2, 3·1·3, where dots/separators are placed in the middle instead of the bottom.   In legitimate mobile app versions:  The separators follow a standard baseline.  Formatting is uniform across devices.  This structure cannot vary from user to user.  But fraudulent installs often contain mobile app versions where:  The separators appear significantly higher than the baseline.  The structure does not match any valid release patterns.  These occur when bots simulate installs without replicating the technical precision of real app metadata.  Moreover, this pattern has been noticed across multiple publishers working with advertisers. Despite high install counts, purchase rates remain very low, confirming a clear metadata-level signature of bot traffic and app fraud.  Learn about the signs you might be experiencing device fraud. How These Unusual App Version Patterns Impact Campaign Performance While this technique might look very low impact, the consequences are not limited to just monetary.   Inflated Install Numbers Bot-generated installs boost the number of total installs, making campaigns appear to be high-performing. This masks real performance and prevents marketers from spotting underperforming channels early.  Misleading Optimization Decisions Fraudulent activity creates false engagement patterns. Due to this, marketers end up shifting budgets toward traffic sources that appear effective but are actually driven by bots, wasting spend and hurting long-term growth.  Unreliable Funnel Metrics Fake installs never convert, engage, or retain. This skews entire funnel data, making it harder to understand real user behavior and accurately measure the quality of your audience.  Misleading Attribution and Affiliate Payouts When bots generate fake installs, publishers or affiliates receive credit for traffic they didn’t actually deliver. This results in unfair payouts and inaccurate performance evaluation.  Lower ROI and LTV Ratio Fake users add no revenue or long-term value, which pulls down overall ROI and LTV benchmarks. This leads marketers to overestimate channel performance while significantly underestimating the actual cost of acquiring genuine, high-quality users.  Therefore, one technical discrepancy like a misplaced dot can impact your entire growth strategy.  How Does mFilterIt Identify this Mobile Ad Fraud Technique? Our ad fraud detection solution conducts a deeper analysis on every traffic source, to differentiate between human and bot-driven data. Some of the parameters used to identify these anomalies:   Analyses metadata that your dashboards can’t see Studies deep metadata—mobile app versions, OS details, device integrity, APK sources, and user-agent patterns thoroughly, revealing subtle bot traffic signals that dashboards and attribution platforms cannot identify independently. It also helps confirm whether the installs came from trusted channels/sources or not.  Identifies abnormal OS-version distributions and mobile ad fraud clusters It compares device versions against normal population patterns, flagging spikes in outdated or scripted versions, common in bot-driven installs operating on obsolete or emulated environments. It also maps recurring inconsistencies, like identical malformed app versions, repeating device signatures, or tight timestamp groupings, to uncover coordinated bot activity rather than isolated technical errors.  Assesses IP reputation and network behaviour Our app fraud detection tool also checks whether installs originate from proxies, VPNs, or data-centre networks, revealing non-consumer routes often used by bots to mask location, identity, and device validity.  Analyses timing behaviour to detect injection patterns By examining click-to-install and event timings, the tool identifies unrealistic timelines, signaling forced installs or automated triggers that do not follow natural user behaviour, generated by affiliates solely to achieve targets and earn payouts.  Blocks invalid traffic before attribution Through pre-MMP and post-MMP checks, the app fraud detection tool stops fraudulent installs in real time, preventing bot traffic from entering analytics, inflating KPIs, or misleading optimization decisions.  Know why attribution platforms miss mobile ad fraud.  Way Forward Unusual app version patterns are just one of many techniques fraudsters use to manipulate installs, which can be used as a red flag to identify an anomaly in your campaign data. However, mobile ad fraud involves multiple evolving techniques that often go undetected in surface-level checks. Identifying these signals is only the beginning. Advertisers need deeper, continuous ad fraud validation to detect anomalies across devices, metadata, networks, and user behaviour. Using an advanced app fraud detection tool enables advertisers to optimize confidently, prevent budget leakages, and build campaigns on clean, trustworthy data.  Strengthen your campaigns. Connect with mFilterIt experts and secure your traffic quality today.

Bot Technique Spotted: How Unusual App Version Patterns Signal Bot Traffic & Fake Installs Read More »

Referral Wins as Genuine

Are Your Referral Wins as Genuine as They Seem?

Leave a Comment / Blog, Mobile Ad Fraud, USA /

You launch a referral program with the intention to acquire new users to your app. When analysing your campaign progress, you see that your referral champion is a single user who somehow ‘invited 200 people overnight’.    You feel confident to spend more on these campaigns. On your dashboard there are 200 people, but upon deeper analysis you see that only a few retain as users. That’s a sign that something is not right. It’s not the usual invalid traffic, but a more advanced and difficult version of ad fraud. Referral and coupon fraud are advanced types of mobile ad fraud which impacts the action driven KPI’s and can skew your data. In this blog, you will discover –  In this blog, you will discover –  What is referral and coupon ad fraud?  How does it happen?   Impact of referral and coupon fraud on campaigns?   How can advertisers protect their referral campaigns?  Real case of a Referral coupon fraud   What is Referral and Coupon Fraud? Referral and coupon fraud are among the most common affiliate marketing fraud that can significantly drain a brand’s paid marketing efforts. Referral Fraud Referral fraud happens when people exploit referral programs to earn rewards without bringing in genuine new users.  What leads to referral fraud?  Creating fake accounts to claim referral bonuses  Using bots or emulators to trigger installs or sign-ups  Sharing referral codes on unauthorized platforms to mass-farm rewards  Coupon Fraud Coupon fraud occurs when fraudsters including dishonest affiliates use invalid codes, promo offers, or counterfeit coupon to claim false monetary benefits without enabling campaign to reach to the new audience.  What leads to coupon fraud?  Using expired or unauthorized coupon codes  Creating multiple accounts to repeatedly use new user offers  Manipulating apps/websites to redeem the same coupon multiple times  Circulating leaked internal or partner-only promo codes  How does Referral and Coupon Fraud happen? In affiliate marketing, referral and coupon ad fraud can happen at large scale. Here’s how each of these tactics contributes to fraud –  First-Time User Fraud This is the most common form of referral fraud. Referral codes are usually meant for new users only, but fraudsters reuse these codes by creating multiple fake accounts. They rely on bots, simulators, device farms, fake emails, and virtual phone numbers to look like new users each time.  Example: In ride apps like Ola or Uber, people often create fake accounts just to claim first-ride promo codes, which drains the advertiser’s budget and inflates fake new-user number.  Self-Referral Fraud In this type of fraud, the same person acts as both the referrer and the referee. Instead of genuinely referring a new user, they use their own information in different combinations such as multiple email IDs or different phone numbers to claim both rewards. Sometimes, they even reuse the same number with minor variations just to game the system.  Fraudulent Coupon Codes Fraudsters misuse promo or referral codes by circulating fake, unauthorized or expired coupon. Users who try to redeem these, end up disappointed when the brand cannot honor them, leading to mistrust and damaging the brand’s credibility. This type of fraud turns simple reward programs into a loophole for illegitimate incentives.  App Cloning (Parallel Space / Dual Apps) App cloning or parallel space gives an advantage to the user to log into two different user accounts simultaneously by creating a separate parallel space on Android devices. This enables them to create multiple accounts, refer themselves, and repeatedly redeem referral rewards. Ride-hailing apps, gaming apps, and social apps often become the targets of this trick.  Gift Card & Return Fraud Losses Fraudsters misuse gift cards, exploit refund loopholes, and combine them with referral rewards to extract illegitimate value leading to revenue loss and compromised program integrity.  Bots, Emulators & VPN/Proxy Abuse Fraudsters rely on automated tools and device manipulation to fake new users. Using bots and emulators, they reinstall apps, regenerate device details, and pretend to be different users. VPNs and proxies hide their real IP addresses or fake their location, making detection difficult. Advanced bots can even use real user information to redeem referral benefits without being caught.  Impact of Referral and Coupon Fraud on Brand The impact of such deceiving tactics falls on brand in the form of –  Wasted Ad Budget: Fraudsters generate fake users, false installs, and invalid coupon redemptions, causing the advertiser’s referral budget to drain quickly.  Lower ROI: Campaign performance looks inflated, but the actual return drops sharply because none of the fraudulent activity contributes to real growth.  Damaged User Trust: Genuine users lose confidence when fraudulent coupon misuse prevents them from accessing the benefits they were promised.  Poor Customer Experience: When rewards fail or referral codes don’t work, both new and existing users feel frustrated and disengaged.  Brand Reputation Hit: Ongoing fraud creates the impression that the brand’s referral or reward system is unreliable, negatively affecting long-term loyalty.  How Advertisers Can Protect Their Referral and Coupon Campaigns When tactics of fraudsters evolve at an alarming pace, protecting referral and coupon campaigns for brands become more important –  Start with Basic Manual Checks Advertisers can begin by reviewing phone numbers, email IDs, and domains used in referral or coupon redemptions. This helps identify obvious patterns like repeated domains, suspicious email formats, or invalid phone numbers. While this offers quick surface-level detection, manual checks cannot catch sophisticated bot activity, device manipulation, or high-volume fraud operations.  Strengthen Protection with a Fraud Detection Solution To truly safeguard referral and coupon campaigns, advertisers should work with a dedicated ad fraud detection provider. Advanced platforms look beyond simple IP repetition and analyze the entire device environment. This includes detecting bots, emulators, disposable emails, virtual phone numbers, app cloning, and suspicious domains, ensuring clean and legitimate referral traffic.  Use Deep Validation & Real-Time Blocking Integrating advanced solutions like an SDK for apps and DSS for websites allows advertisers to validate traffic at every touchpoint. Key checks such as device IDs, email authenticity, domain hygiene, digital reputation, phone number legitimacy, cloning flags, and IP behavior, help identify fraud instantly. Advertisers receive real-time fraud scores and can automatically block fraudulent device IDs before they drain budgets or degrade user experience.  How mFilterIt Safeguard Against Sophisticated Referral and Coupon Fraud mFilterit’s ad fraud protection tool Valid8 enables advertisers and brands to have a keen look on whether the traffic is coming from a legitimate source or not. Here’s how the right solution tackles referral and coupon fraud –  Validates Every User at a Device-Environment Level Valid8 goes beyond basic IP checks and analyzes the complete device environment. It detects

Are Your Referral Wins as Genuine as They Seem? Read More »

Ad Fraud in USA

Ad Fraud Signals Your Attribution Platform Misses and How to Fix Them

USA, Blog, Mobile Ad Fraud /

If you’re running app campaigns at scale, you’ve probably seen this before. Your attribution reports look clean, installs are coming in, and your ad fraud detection tool shows no major issues—yet the overall quality of users doesn’t feel right.  For app marketers, with fraud checks now bundled into most attribution platforms, it’s easy to assume traffic quality is covered. But these validations are mainly built to ensure installs are attributed correctly, not to deeply assess how users behave after they enter the app. And that’s where things start to drift.  The challenge for marketers isn’t spotting obvious fraud anymore; it’s making sense of why validated traffic still underperforms. Cohorts don’t retain as expected. Conversions don’t scale the way spend does. Business impact feels weaker than what the top-line numbers suggest.  In this blog, we cover:   The key signs attribution platforms miss   Impact of missed ad fraud signals on app campaigns   How mFilterIt helps marketers to solve this  Key Signs Your Current Tools Might Be Missing Manual and traditional monitoring tools overlook some serious ad fraud signs that lead to long-term impacts. Let’s understand each of them –  Abnormal Click-to-Install Ratios Abnormal click-to-install ratios are one of the clearest signs that something is off. In our 8-day analysis, we saw an extremely high number of clicks but almost no installs, resulting in a CTIT of just 0.01% on 03-08-2025. Such unusual click patterns cannot happen with real users. It’s a strong indicator of bot activity, where automated systems continuously click on ads without ever converting, making it harder to detect.  Spam + Bot Traffic Masquerading as Average Let’s take it a step further. We already saw high clicks with very few installs, but the conversion rate makes it even more suspicious. Out of all the installs, only a tiny fraction went on to make a purchase. For example, in one case with 170 million clicks and 249K installs, only 384 real orders were placed, resulting in a conversion rate of just 0.154%. This gap strongly suggests spam or bot traffic rather than genuine users that cannot be tracked with manual monitoring or traditional monitoring tools. Sudden Increase in Low-Value Orders There was a sudden and noticeable surge in low-revenue orders, which is a clear sign of arbitrage. This usually happens when dishonest affiliates pay users a small amount to place very cheap orders, just to make it look like their channel is driving sales. In reality, these orders are fake signals meant to earn them higher commissions.  Bot Impressions at Odd Hours The graph shows impression rate on y-axis and hours on x-axis. As it indicates, impression rate surges exorbitantly at 3 am in night which cannot be a possible human activity. After observing the pattern of 10 consecutive days, it defines clearly that impression rate rises at night everyday hence indicating a huge bot or emulator involvement.  What Happens When These Threats Go Unnoticed Attribution tools miss these sophisticated fraud patterns, allowing hidden ad fraud threats to slip through, ultimately causing the following impacts:  Wasted ad spend on non-human or low-quality traffic The impact of the above threats is severe especially impacting your budget spend. Imagine you putting every stretch of budget in optimizing your resources to attract organic users. However, bots, emulators, or low-quality sources flood your campaigns. Over time, this wasted spend snowballs, pulling budget away from high-value channels and slowing down growth when it matters most.   Inflated KPIs that distort optimization and scaling decisions Fraud-driven traffic artificially boosts campaign metrics like clicks, installs, CTRs, etc., creating an illusion of performance that leads to no conversions. When teams optimize or scale based on these inflated KPIs, campaigns drive in the wrong direction. This leads to misallocated budgets, misguided testing, and strategies built on numbers that don’t reflect real user behavior.  Misattribution of conversions, hurting partner relationships When campaign metrics are inflated due to fake engagement by fraudulent sources, wrong partners get the credit. Authentic publishers or affiliates lose credit for the users they genuinely bring in, damaging trust and straining relationships. Over time, this misalignment makes teams second-guess which partners to scale or pause.  Lower ROI and disrupted campaign performance When fake or low-quality traffic pollutes your funnel, your cost per outcome increases while real conversions stagnate. This directly erodes ROI and disrupts campaign efficiency. Fraud pushes teams to spend more to chase the same results, ultimately dragging down overall marketing profitability.  Compromised long-term growth due to unreliable data Fraud doesn’t just distort today’s numbers, it corrupts the historical data you rely on for forecasting, budgeting, audience insights, and long-term strategy. When data integrity slips, so does decision quality. This creates a ripple effect: inaccurate models, misinformed planning, and slower growth across channels and quarters.  How mFilterIt helps App Marketers Optimize their Campaigns? Advanced traffic validation solution like mFilterIt’s Valid8 fill the critical gaps left by manual and legacy monitoring, offering deeper protection and smarter insights. Here’s what right ad traffic solutions brings –   Know Exactly Where Your Traffic Comes From With source-level transparency, gain a clear visibility into every source, sub-source, and placement. This helps you quickly spot unusual patterns, identify underperforming partners, and understand which channels actually drive real value.  Catch Fraud the Moment It Happens Real-time alerts enable you stop suspicious clicks, installs, or spikes instantly before they drain budgets or skew your results. No waiting, no guessing.  Verify If a Device Is Genuine With enormous bots and emulators hampering the performance metrics, advanced solutions check whether each device interacting with your ads is real, active, and human-driven. These checks filter out bots, emulators, cloned devices, and anything pretending to be a real user.  Uncover Advanced Fraud Tactics With advanced ad fraud detection tools, go beyond basic red flags. Detect all the sophisticated fraud tactics like click flooding, install hijacking, etc. To outsmart tricks that are built to look “clean” but quietly damage performance.  Way Ahead Indeed, digital advertising opens windows of opportunities for you, but it also opens the doors   for fraudsters as well. While attribution tools are still helpful in surface-level analysis, they cannot simply outsmart the sophisticated fraud types. By implementing the right ad fraud detection tool, there will be visible impacts in the form of –  Cleaner, High-Quality Traffic: Blocks bots, farms, and spoofed devices so only real users enter your funnel from the start.  Better Campaign Performance: Removes fake activity to make accurate, decisioning sharper, and optimizations better.  Higher ROAS, Lower Waste: Brings your budget to real users, reducing acquisition costs and improving returns across every channel.  Improved Partner Transparency: Identifies quickly the underperforming or suspicious affiliates, networks, and publishers. Hence, the right ad fraud detection software is must for you to win the digital advertising game and continuing to win in the future.  To know how

Ad Fraud Signals Your Attribution Platform Misses and How to Fix Them Read More »

Device Spoofing

Device Spoofing at the Impression Level: How User-Agent Anomalies Impact Campaign Data

Blog, Mobile Ad Fraud /

Detecting fake devices isn’t as easy as it used to be.  There was a time when the red flags used to be clearly visible – random clicks at odd hours or sudden traffic spikes from unfamiliar regions. Those patterns made it simple to tell when bots were at play.  But fraudsters have now become smarter. Instead of relying on easily traceable bot behavior, they now use sophisticated techniques to spoof impressions and pretend to be real users on real devices. This next-level masking of fake devices as real is known as device spoofing, and it’s quietly reshaping how ad fraud hides in today’s campaigns.  Unlike traditional bot traffic, spoofed devices mimic genuine user behavior so well that standard validation platforms struggle to tell them apart. The result? Campaign dashboards that look real but are actually filled with fake interactions. What is Device Spoofing? Techniques Used for Device Spoofing Device spoofing is a sophisticated ad fraud technique where fraudsters disguise fake, old, or low-quality devices to appear as genuine, tricking marketers into counting them as real users. Common device spoofing techniques include:  Geo-Location Manipulation Fraudsters spoof GPS coordinates or use proxies/VPNs to mimic users from premium regions. This helps them access high-value audiences and inflate campaign reach in targeted geographies without using real devices.  Simulated or Fake Devices Fraudsters alter device IDs, OS versions, screen resolutions, or hardware profiles to make outdated or non-existent devices appear new, authentic, and high performing.  Browser Spoofing They alter browser fingerprints, including headers, plugins, versions, and configurations, enabling fake environments to perfectly mimic real browsers and bypass platform-level verification or anomaly detection systems.  User Agent String Manipulation Fraudsters manipulate technical details like device IDs, operating system details, user-agent strings, browser information, etc., making it difficult for ad platforms to detect them as fake devices.   This means, while you believe your ads are reaching real people, a portion of that ‘audience’ might actually be nonexistent, generating fake impressions.   In a recent case, our tool detected a surge of ad impressions coming from devices supposedly running on Android OS 6. On the surface, that seemed fine until our system cross-checked the actual device model metadata.  It turned out that these devices were originally released with Android 9, supporting upgrades to Android 10 or 11.  This technical mismatch, an outdated OS appearing on a newer model, was a clear red flag. It revealed that fraudsters had manipulated the device identity to make fake traffic appear genuine, hoping to slip past standard detection systems.  Why Marketers Need to Validate Device IDs in Their Campaigns? Device IDs and user-agent strings are two of the earliest signals that define “who” your ads are actually reaching. Device spoofing doesn’t just manipulate campaign data because when these signals are manipulated, everything built on top of them becomes unreliable. Here’s how:  Device IDs are the backbone of attribution, frequency & measurement Device IDs determine how platforms track reach, frequency, and conversions. When fraudsters spoof or rotate them, one device appears as hundreds of unique users. As a result, frequency caps stop working, and attribution becomes inaccurate. Marketers unknowingly pay more to reach fewer real users because the foundational identity signal is corrupted from the start.  User-agent strings validate whether a device ID is plausible A device ID is easy to fabricate, but a user-agent string provides context about OS, browser, and device type. When these don’t match, like a new device running an outdated OS or many IDs sharing the same UA, it signals synthetic traffic. UA validation helps separate real devices from scripted environments.  Unchecked device IDs pollute media optimization & audience models Fake device IDs contaminate remarketing pools, distort lookalike audiences, and push automated bidding systems toward non-human traffic. Over time, targeting becomes less accurate and more expensive, even if campaign metrics appear stable. The performance engine quietly drifts away from real customers because its learning data comes from manipulated or spoofed identities.  Device & user-agent inconsistencies reveal impression-level fraud early Device and UA metadata are available from the first impression, making them valuable for early fraud detection. Mismatches in OS versions, device lifecycle, browser type, or session stability quickly expose spoofed devices. Identifying these inconsistencies upfront prevents downstream wastage and protects campaign performance before budgets begin to leak.  This helps marketers ask better questions Understanding device IDs and UA signals helps marketers challenge suspicious reach spikes, inconsistent delivery, or unexplained traffic patterns. It encourages smarter conversations with publishers and reduces reliance on surface-level KPIs like CTR. In an ecosystem full of manipulated traffic, signal literacy becomes a strategic advantage for protecting ROI and improving transparency.  Therefore, advertisers need advanced ad fraud detection solutions like Valid8 by mFilterIt to protect their ads from device spoofing. Our tool helps validate device IDs, user-agent strings, and impression-level signals in real time.   This enables the marketer to take investment decisions with confidence and ensure their ads reach the right audience.   For more information, contact our experts.

Device Spoofing at the Impression Level: How User-Agent Anomalies Impact Campaign Data Read More »

organic poaching

Organic Poaching: The Overlooked Holiday Threat to Affiliate Performance

USA, Blog, Mobile Ad Fraud /

Imagine stretching the final leg of your ad budget and optimizing every campaign for maximum ROI — only to realize you’re paying twice for traffic that was already yours. Sounds unreal? Let’s break it down.  As the USA Holiday Season 2025 approaches, advertisers are gearing up for the biggest shopping surge of the year. From Black Friday to Cyber Monday, every click, impression, and install counts. Affiliate partnerships remain one of the strongest levers to drive app installs, boost new user acquisition, and accelerate end-of-year growth.  But behind this surge in activity lies a subtle yet costly challenge organic poaching. While affiliate-driven numbers rise, organic performance quietly drops. You intended to acquire new users, yet many of those paid installs are your own organic users  redirected and claimed by affiliates. Organic poaching happens when affiliates hijack credit for users who were already on their way to install your app organically. Through techniques like last click attribution hijacking, delayed redirects, or tracking manipulation, affiliate fraud occurs, making genuine organic installs appear as paid ones.  For advertisers, this creates a major blind spot:  Attribution data becomes unreliable, masking real performance. Budgets get misallocated, rewarding fraudulent sources over genuine ones. ROI calculations lose accuracy, impacting decisions on scaling, optimization, and partner payouts. In short, while you think your campaigns are driving fresh conversions, you’re often just paying to reacquire your existing audience — one poached install at a time.  In this blog, you will discover:  How organic poaching works  Why organic poaching spikes during the Holiday Season  The cost of overlooking organic poaching  Protecting true performance with ad traffic detection solutions What is Organic Poaching?  Mobile ad fraud continues to expand its footprint, making tracking and validation more complex than ever. Organic poaching is one such deceptive form of mobile ad fraud that’s increasingly hard to detect. It occurs when affiliates manipulate last click attribution to claim credit for users who would have installed the app organically. Fraudsters intercept genuine user journeys, stealing the credit for the organic installs. . In short, brands end up paying affiliates for traffic and conversions that were already theirs.  How Organic Poaching Works?  The primary aim of organic poaching is to steal the last-click attribution credit for an install. Let’s know how it is done –  1. User intent (organic) A real user finds your app organically (search, store browse, friend recommendation) and taps to install.   2. Presence of a malicious actor The user’s device has a malicious app that gets active whenever an install is processing in the device (broadcasts, package events, referrer hooks, or page navigation).  3. Last-second signal injection Right before the install finishes, the fraudster fires a fake click and sends that event to the Mobile Measurement Partner (MMP) or tracking endpoint. This is timed to be the ‘last touch.’  4. MMP attributes by last-click Through MMP’s last-touch logic, the last click right before the install is recorded in affiliate’s name, giving them the credit of the install.  5. Fraudster receives credit/payout: The hijacked attribution shows up in reporting and triggers commission or KPI credit for the bad partner, making them pay for the organic traffic.  Common Forms of Organic Poaching  There are sophisticated forms of organic poaching that directly impact the installs – 1. Click Spamming: The Volume Illusion Fraudsters generate a flood of fake clicks to steal credit for genuine installs. Often, users unknowingly install apps infected with malware. The user never sees it, but it lives in the background, and the fraudsters are clicking on it, a tactic known as click flooding.  2. Click Injection: The Millisecond Hijack Click injection is a more advanced form of ad fraud than click spamming and much harder to detect. Instead of firing multiple fake clicks, it uses one perfectly timed click to steal credit for an organic install, letting fraudsters claim last-click credit and payment for an install that happened organically.  Read in detail the difference between click spamming and click injection  Why Organic Poaching is a Major Threat During the Holiday Season  The Holiday Season doesn’t just increase the conversion but also the attention of fraudsters who are waiting to receive the attribution for the efforts they never did. Here’s why holiday rush becomes a hub spot for organic poaching –  1. Massive Spikes in Organic Activity During festive periods, users are naturally more active, downloading shopping, travel, finance, and entertainment apps at record rates, making these apps an easy prey of organic poaching. 2. Performance Pressure Marketers who aim to maximize conversions and meet their KPIs often partner with bad actors, loosening compliance checks and capturing attribution on already ongoing installs. 3. Attribution Systems Under Load When MMPs and tracking systems process huge volumes of events per second, even small delays or data overlaps can create attribution blind spots. Fraudsters capitalize on these technical bottlenecks to inject clicks or spoof installs that “fit” into timing gaps. The Cost of Overlooking Organic Poaching  Overlooking organic poaching doesn’t just lead to wasted ad spend, it impacts the accuracy of your entire performance ecosystem. Here’s what’s at stake:  Affiliate Payouts: Fraudulent affiliates claim commissions on installs that originated organically, draining budgets that could fuel real acquisition.  Channel ROI: Misattributed installs inflate affiliate performance metrics, making dishonest partners look profitable while masking the true impact of legitimate ones.  Optimization Decisions: Fraudsters scale affiliate marketing campaigns based on false success, diverting spend toward fraudulent sources and away from high-value, authentic traffic. Attribution Data: When organic users are wrongly tagged as paid, the integrity of your entire measurement system is compromised.  Partner Trust: Genuine affiliates lose credit, and advertiser confidence in the partner ecosystem weakens.  Long-Term Growth: With decisions driven by fake data, future user acquisition strategies rest on unreliable insights.  Protecting True Performance with Right Traffic Validation    As affiliates and ad networks gain more control over attribution, protecting true performance has never been more crucial. The right ad traffic validation solution helps you monitor and measure affiliate performance with confidence. For end-to-end traffic monitoring, mFilterIt’s

Organic Poaching: The Overlooked Holiday Threat to Affiliate Performance Read More »

MMP Fraud Detection in USA

Why Bundled MMP Fraud Detection Isn’t Enough to Protect Your App Growth

Blog, Mobile Ad Fraud, USA /

If you think your MMP’s built-in fraud detection is keeping your app safe, think again.  Behind every “successful” campaign report, there’s a silent leak which the bundled MMP fraud filters often miss. From install hijacking masked as organic growth to sophisticated bot farms mimicking real user behaviour, fraud today is engineered to look clean in your MMP dashboard. And that’s precisely the problem.  MMPs were built to measure, not to mitigate. Their bundled fraud detection tools are designed to keep attribution accurate, not to uncover the nuanced, evolving fraud patterns that drain budgets and distort growth metrics. Yet many app marketers rely solely on them, believing their campaigns are fully protected, while hidden fraud continues to erode ROI in the background.  To truly safeguard your app installs, measurement isn’t enough — validation is.   In this blog, you will discover:  The Evolving Face of Mobile Ad fraud   Sophisticated Types of Mobile Ad Fraud  The Business Impact of Undetected Fraud  Why MMP Protection is not Enough to Detect Growing Ad Fraud  Busting Myths behind MMP’s Built-in Fraud Detection     Why 360° Mobile Ad Fraud Protection is the Only Solution  Key Takeaways for Marketers  The Evolving Face of Mobile Ad Fraud The dynamics of mobile advertising fraud have evolved unprecedently. What once relied on simple bot clicks has transformed into sophisticated schemes. As ad spend increases so does the complexities of mobile ad fraud. Let’s understand how it has grown over time-  1. Early Fake Installs & Click Farms Fraudsters perform fake installs or repeatedly click on your ads without any real engagement, draining your budget and skewing campaign performance.  2. Device Farms Networks of devices controlled by fraudsters mimic real user behaviour like app installs, clicking ads, or opening apps, falsely inflating performance metrics and claiming attribution.  3. SDK Spoofing & Click Injection Fraudsters manipulate SDKs and inject fake clicks or postbacks, creating the illusion of installs and user activity.  4. Incent & Referral Fraud Fraudsters exploit referral campaigns by completing actions like installs or claiming bonuses they never earned, inflating campaign metrics.  5. Install Hijacking Install hijacking presents fake installs as legitimate and falsely claims attribution, leading to lost ROI and corrupted data.  The Sophisticated Forms of Mobile Ad Fraud Brands Must Know Sophisticated forms of mobile advertising fraud that often remain undetected due to limited expertise of MMPs are –  1. Incentivized Install Fraud Fraudsters boost installs by offering rewards for quick sign-ups, making them look organic. But this leads to low quality users performing app installs merely for the incentives, resulting into low retention, high drop-offs, and wasted ad spend with distorted metrics.  2. Re-Engagement Fraud Fraudsters perform fake app installs, session, or in-app actions to give a false narrative of legitimate user action. This allows them to claim retargeting payouts without any real user activity, causing inflated metrics and misleading data.  3. Organic Hijacking Before a genuine user completes the install process, fraudsters trigger the last-click events to steal credit, skewing channel performance and increasing user acquisition cost.  4. Impression & Click-Level Fraud Bots, with their complex functioning, generate fake ad impressions and flood clicks, hijacking attribution before installs even happen.  The Business Impact of Undetected Fraud The impact of mobile ad fraud is huge, and unavoidable, let’s know how –  Ad Spend Losses – Advertisers unknowingly pay for fake clicks, installs, or re-engagements that drains marketing budget.  Poor User Retention – Incentivized or low-quality users install apps causing high churn and low lifetime value.  Inaccurate ROI Calculations – Fraud inflates performance metrics, making campaigns seem profitable when they are not.  Misattribution of High-Performing Channels – Fraudulent activity steals credit from genuine campaigns, skewing UA strategy.  Compromised Retargeting Budgets – Fake re-engagements cause wasted spend on retargeting campaigns.  Distorted LTV – Low-quality installs lead to uninstalls soon, misleading long-term performance metrics.  Erosion of Brand Trust – Partners, affiliates, and users lose confidence in your marketing integrity.  Difficulty Scaling Campaigns – Without clean data, optimization decisions are flawed, limiting growth potential.  Why MMP Protection cannot Tackle Evolving Fraud Tactics While your brand relies on attribution platforms, the validation of genuine traffic is drifting apart with MMP’s not able to tackle them. Let’s know how –  1. Multi-layered tactics Your attribution platform plays a major role on deciding who gets the credit but are the genuine users really receiving it? Fraudsters mix real human traffic with bots and low-quality users to create a layered signal. As a result, some installs and clicks appear legitimate, while others are fraudulent, hiding the true impact on your campaigns.  2. Cross-channel complexity The spectrum of mobile advertising fraud is not limited to one channel. It spreads across affiliates, and even walled gardens, each with its own reporting system and attribution logic.  Fraudsters exploit these inconsistencies to move undetected between platforms, making it nearly impossible for MMPs to pinpoint the true source of installs  3. Attribution manipulation and the illusion of “performance” MMPs track installs and conversions, but they often rely on surface-level attribution signals. Fraudsters generate invalid clicks manipulate attribution systems to take credit for installs and conversions they didn’t generate. The result is an illusion of performance where campaigns appear successful on the surface metrics, but retention, in-app activity, and ROI tell a different story.  Busting Myths behind MMP’s Built-in Fraud Detection Partnering with an MMP is essential, but its capabilities often stop at surface-level metrics. It’s a good start for tackling mobile advertising fraud, yet as conversion rates drop, the real impact becomes clear. While MMPs do basic pattern detection and install validation but that is only the tip of the iceberg.  What lies underneath? 1. Undetected Fraudulent Behaviour MMPs are designed to assign credit for installs and conversions. However, they cannot deeply investigate the fraudulent behaviour generating invalid traffic.  2. Threshold-based fraud tools Most bundled tools flag activity only when it crosses preset limits, missing subtle or sophisticated fraud patterns.  3. Limited data analysis MMPs often ignore pre-install signals (impressions, clicks) and post-install quality, making detection complex and hampering optimization process.  Consequence

Why Bundled MMP Fraud Detection Isn’t Enough to Protect Your App Growth Read More »

Why Attribution Platforms Can’t Tell You the Full Truth About Mobile Ad Fraud

Why Attribution Platforms Can’t Tell You the Full Truth About Mobile Ad Fraud

Blog, Mobile Ad Fraud /

Mobile marketers often trust attribution platforms as the single source of truth for campaign performance. They tell you where installs are coming from, which channels drive conversions, and how your ad spend translates into results. But what if that “truth” isn’t the full picture?  The uncomfortable reality is that attribution platforms were never designed to detect or prevent ad fraud; they were built to measure performance. And in today’s ecosystem, where fraudulent installs and fake users can mimic real behavior almost perfectly, that distinction matters more than ever.  This gap between what’s attributed and what’s actually real is where millions in marketing budgets silently leak away. To understand why attribution data alone can mislead you—and what you should really be looking at to uncover the truth—you’ll need to look beyond the dashboard.  Let’s break down where attribution platforms fall short, how fraudsters exploit these blind spots, and what a more transparent, validation-first approach looks like. The New Face of Ad Fraud: How Sophisticated Mixing of Ad Fraud Masks the Truth  Mobile app fraud is not just limited to bot-inflated installs. The current mobile ad fraud landscape is a complex ecosystem of blended techniques, used to pass as legitimate traffic and bypass traditional attribution checks. Fraudsters have become experts at mixing ad traffic with bots and incorporating techniques that cause human-like engagement, creating the illusion of healthy campaigns.  Instead of flooding campaigns with just bot traffic, they now use multi-layered operations that mimic organic user patterns. Therefore, the advertisers are under the illusion that their campaigns are working fine. But the retention and ROI remain questionable. Let us break down this process of illusion for you to understand how fraudsters are mixing the ad traffic.  Phase 1 – The Setup: Bots, Emulators, and Fake Traffic The illusion begins with bots, emulators, and fake devices generating huge volumes of clicks and installs. This early activity creates a surge of engagement, giving marketers the impression that their campaigns are performing well. These fake signals inflate dashboards, making campaigns look active and successful right from the start.  Phase 2 – The Mask: Click Flooding and Organic Hijacking Once the initial numbers look strong, fraudsters flood campaigns with fake clicks to hijack last-click attribution for real installs happening later. This click flooding balances click-to-install ratios, keeping the data within “normal” ranges and avoiding suspicion.  Phase 3 – The Blend: Mix of Bots, Hijacks, and Incentivized Users To complete the illusion, low-quality or incentivized users are mixed with fake and real traffic. This combination keeps engagement, retention, and conversion metrics looking believable — even though the underlying traffic quality is poor. Together, these phases hide invalid activity under seemingly perfect performance.  The Impact:  Unusual spike in installs that happen around the same time instead of being spread out naturally.  Misleading engagement metrics that overpromise and underdeliver.  Fake retention and purchase events that misguide campaign optimization.  The sophistication of these mixed techniques means that mobile app fraud isn’t just invisible; it’s believable if left invalidated.  Dive deeper into how fake ad traffic illusion impacts campaigns  Where Attribution Platforms Fall Short? Attribution platforms only answer one question for you – who gets the credit for an install? But they don’t answer – whether the traffic was genuine? Or how to make the spends more efficient?  Most attribution systems work on deterministic tracking, relying on timestamps, partner data, and click IDs. This approach helps distribute credit, but it’s blind to fraudulent patterns hiding inside the data.  Here’s why built-in ad fraud detection solutions often fail:  Rule-Based Detection: Static conditions like “block if CTIT < 10 seconds” can’t keep up with evolving types of mobile app fraud techniques.  Lack of Behavioral Analysis: Attribution models don’t analyze post-install engagement depth or session behavior.  No Cross-Source Visibility: They can’t connect anomalies across multiple networks or publisher IDs.  SDK Blind Spots: Fake SDK signals pass off as real activity because attribution systems assume authenticity.  What You Lose Without an Independent App Traffic Validation Tool? The financial impact of unvalidated traffic goes far beyond a few wasted installs. It corrupts every stage of the marketing funnel.  Wasted Ad Spend- Every fake click, install, or event means money spent on people who don’t actually exist. Even a small amount of this fake activity can quietly eat up a big part of your yearly ad budget.  Unreliable Data – Fake installs corrupt analytics systems. Campaigns optimized on this data double down on the wrong channels, making future strategies less effective.  False Confidence – Attribution dashboards show growth that doesn’t exist, giving marketing teams the illusion of performance and ROI.  Long-Term Damage – Unvalidated traffic inflates acquisition costs and weakens retention. When fake users fill your funnel, your CAC (Cost per Acquisition) rises, LTV (Lifetime Value) drops, and your optimization models start chasing ghosts.  How Independent App Traffic Validation Solutions Like mFilterIt Help?   App fraud detection is the missing link between tracking install attribution and validating the true source of attribution. That’s why independent mobile ad fraud detection tools are essential; they go beyond tracking to verify every click, install, and in-app event, helping marketers see the real picture of campaign performance and protect every dollar of ad spend.  Here’s what independent app traffic validation tools provide:  1. Get a Clearer Picture with AI-Powered Traffic Validation Modern validation platforms use machine learning and big data analytics to scan millions of signals at once. They identify unusual patterns in clicks, installs, or events, catching sophisticated fraud in real time before it impacts your reports or ROI.   2. Eliminate Fake Installs with Unique Device Identification The tool creates a unique digital fingerprint for every device. Validation tools use this to detect when multiple installs come from the same emulated or cloned devices, helping eliminate fake device activity that appears real to attribution dashboards.   3. Catch Click Flooding Early with CTIT Analysis CTIT measures the time between an ad click and the app install. Genuine users take a few seconds or minutes, while bots or hijacked clicks show instant

Why Attribution Platforms Can’t Tell You the Full Truth About Mobile Ad Fraud Read More »

Mobile Ad Fraud

How a Leading MENA Ride-Hailing App Cut Mobile Ad Fraud & Boosted ROI

MENA, Blog, Mobile Ad Fraud /

Every performance marketer running a user acquisition campaign has the same goal – to increase the number of app installs and lower CPI. But often, the post-install metrics don’t match what campaign dashboards show. Despite high marketing spends, performance looks inflated and unpredictable. The numbers eventually stop making sense due to low engagement and poor retention. And this usually means one thing: you’re acquiring installs, but not real users. This gap between installs and engagement clearly indicates mobile ad fraud – deceptive tactics used to manipulate mobile advertising campaigns and post-install metrics. A threat that eats into budgets even before marketers notice. That is why, while chasing installs, it is also important for marketers to ensure those installs are not the work of bots, click farms, or devices mimicking real behaviour, but real active users. In this article, we will talk about mobile ad fraud, how it impacts user acquisition campaign performance, and how an app traffic validation solution solves the problem using a real-case example of one of the leading MENA region ride-hailing platforms. The Hidden Problem Behind ‘Successful’ Campaigns Mobile app fraud doesn’t always look suspicious. It hides behind glowing campaign reports and conversion metrics, until looked into carefully. Fraudsters use various hard-to-detect techniques to manipulate CAC, inflate ROI metrics, and drain advertising budgets. The problem becomes worse in affiliate-driven campaigns, where marketers rely on multiple partners and traffic sources, each claiming their share of conversions. Here are some of the common types of mobile ad fraud techniques you need to watch for: 1. Click Spamming Fraudsters send a large number of fake clicks hoping to get credit when a real user installs the app later. It inflates click numbers and hijacks attribution. 2. Click Injection This happens when malicious apps detect new installs and inject fake clicks just before the install completes, stealing credit from genuine sources. 3. Fake Installs or Bot Installs Automated bots or emulators install apps to simulate user growth, wasting spend and polluting engagement data. 4. SDK Spoofing Fraudsters manipulate app SDKs to generate fake in-app events, such as signups or purchases, without any real user activity. 5. Device Farms Groups of physical or virtual devices repeatedly install and uninstall apps to mimic new users, tricking campaigns into paying for fake conversions. Each of these tactics has a different method, but the result is always the same – invalid traffic, invalid app installs, wasted spend, and misleading data. So, if you notice installs rising in your campaigns but not matching the engagement metrics, you might be paying for bots, not buyers. Case in Point: How We Detected Mobile Ad Fraud for a MENA Region Ride Hailing App One of the leading ride-booking app platforms in MENA was aggressively scaling across ad networks and affiliate channels. Their goal was to acquire new users and expand its rider and driver base rapidly. While running campaigns, everything looked promising at first. Installs were growing fast, and campaigns were delivering with high conversions. But the post-install activity told a different story; many new users never completed their first ride. Here’s what they discovered during the app traffic audit: Over 60% of installs were invalid, driven largely by click spamming and fake devices. Fake in-app events, such as ride completions and referrals, were skewing engagement metrics. Rogue publishers were inflating performance numbers to claim payouts. Lack of visibility across diverse fraud types and evolving attack patterns. The result? Wasted marketing spend, misleading reports, declining ROI, and the problem spread across the full user journey. After recognizing the intensity of budget leak, the team decided it was time to clean the funnel from the top to bottom. Deploying App Traffic Validation: Cleaning the Funnel & Focusing on Real Users To rebuild visibility and trust, we helped the ride-hailing platform implement AI-driven traffic validation across the entire user acquisition funnel, from the first click to in-app events. Using our AI-ML-based advanced app traffic validation solution – Valid8, we helped them monitor traffic in real-time, right from the moment a user clicks on an ad, installs the app, to when they start booking rides or referring friends. With AI and behavioral intelligence, we helped them analyze device environments, traffic sources, and user behavior to flag anomalies and separate genuine users from fraudulent ones, such as automated ride completions or fake referrals. As a result, the marketing team could finally see which partners were driving genuine users, and within three months: Install fraud dropped by more than 20%, from 61.37% in March to 38.29% in May. Fake event fraud activity declined sharply after validation filters were applied, particularly post-April, following stricter validation measures for SDK manipulation and event spoofing. Budgets were reallocated toward verified, high-quality sources.   Therefore, the platform gained end-to-end visibility and control, across campaign management, faster partner optimization, and long-term user base quality enhancement. The Impact: Real Data, Real Users, Real Growth The deployment of mFilterIt’s app traffic validation and app fraud detection solution brought about significant improvements in both the quality of traffic and the overall campaign performance for the ride-hailing app. By validating every user at both the install and event stages, the platform was able to shift from a reactive to a proactive fraud prevention approach. Media spends became more efficient, with budgets redirected away from low-quality sources and toward high-performing channels. Moreover, reporting clarity improved, with daily fraud insights and publisher-wise diagnostics building stronger trust across internal marketing, analytics, and leadership teams. Validated insights also helped rebuild confidence across departments, marketing, analytics, and leadership. The brand was no longer just acquiring users; it was acquiring verified users who truly interacted with the app, leading to better retention, improved ROI, and stronger customer trust. Takeaways for App Marketers Every marketer aims for growth and numbers, but real growth depends on users. If MENA’s case study hits the relatable chord, here’s what you should remember: Don’t measure success by installs alone. Track the entire funnel from installs to events to engagement and retention to spot inconsistencies

How a Leading MENA Ride-Hailing App Cut Mobile Ad Fraud & Boosted ROI Read More »

Festive Season Ad Spend from Mobile Ad Fraud

Marketers’ DIY Guide: Safeguard Your Festive Season Ad Spend from Mobile Ad Fraud

Blog, Mobile Ad Fraud /

The festive season in India is like a high-stakes battleground for consumer attention, and in 2025 the stakes are even bigger.  This year, brands are using all possible strategies with irresistible festive offers. More than ever, AI-powered tools are being used to personalize campaigns, predict shopping behavior, and create highly targeted festive experiences for consumers.  Recent reports reveal that digital ad spends are expected to shoot up by 15–25% this year. That’s over ₹60,000 crore expected to be invested (nearly half of the industry’s yearly budget) into the ecosystem in just a few weeks – Dussehra to New Year.  Moreover, shoppers are equally excited. 80% of brands plan to increase their festive budget compared to last year, and most of that action will happen on mobile-first platforms.  This is the golden time of the year for performance marketers to scale their app performance, boost customer acquisition, and maximize ROI.   However, scaling business growth through mobile advertising campaigns during the festive season is not as simple as it might sound. While brands prepare to shine, fraudsters prepare too – to drain festive ad budgets with fake installs, bot-driven clicks, click flooding tactics, event spoofing, etc.   And during high-stakes periods, when the competition is even more fierce, even a small leakage can snowball into lost sales and damaged ROI.  So, how do you make sure the glowing numbers on your dashboard aren’t just smoke and mirrors? The answer is – by detecting and preventing mobile ad fraud this festive season before it hits your bottom line.   TL; DR, what to expect from this article:  Why mobile ad fraud spikes during the festive season?  A hands-on checklist to spot and block mobile ad fraud  The risks of ignoring fraud during festive season  How an ad fraud detection solution helps protect performance campaigns?  Why Mobile Ad Fraud Peaks During Festive Season?  During festive seasons, whether it’s Diwali in India, Ramadan in the Middle East, or Black Friday across global markets, brands significantly increase their marketing investments. And fraudsters follow the money, waiting for chances like these. Moreover, affiliates and media partners also compete aggressively to deliver results in volume. This creates a perfect storm for sophisticated fraud tactics to slip through traditional ways of ad fraud detection.  Here’s why fraud peaks during festive campaigns:  1. Festive budgets attract fraudsters When brands increase ad spends during the season, fraudsters see it as the perfect opportunity to grab a bigger portion of ad budgets as compared to normal days.  2. Traffic volumes overload systems With millions of clicks and installs happening in a short span, it becomes tougher to spot which ones are real and which ones are fake without the right app fraud detection strategy in place.  3. Pressure to deliver numbers Affiliates and media partners often push for higher volumes to deliver results on a faster and larger scale often using various methods, which means fraudulent traffic can slip through unchecked.  4.Short and intense campaign timelines  Festive campaigns usually run for a few weeks. In the rush to maximize results quickly, marketers don’t always get the time to investigate suspicious activity.  5. Shoppers are more active on mobiles Since most festive shopping now happens on mobile, fraudsters use fake devices, bots, and emulators to mimic real user activity, making fraud harder to catch. The Cost of Ignoring Mobile Ad Fraud During High-stakes Periods like Festive Season Ignoring these red flags can be disastrous for brands running mobile advertising campaigns:  Fraudulent traffic consumes budgets that should be driving real festive conversions.  Customer acquisition costs also spike as fake installs get counted.  Fraud makes campaigns look successful when in reality, genuine reach is limited.  Every dollar wasted on fake users is one less spent reaching real shoppers.  Poor campaign performance badly on brands and damages affiliate trust.  Festive campaigns have short windows, meaning there’s little room for error. But by the time mobile ad fraud is detected, the damage is already done.  The DIY Festive Season Mobile Ad Fraud Detection Checklist for Marketers  While recognizing sophisticated levels of mobile ad fraud requires an advanced AI-ML-based ad fraud detection solution to be in place, many patterns of fraudulent activities can be identified using simple observation.   This DIY checklist is made specifically for marketers to address mobile app fraud, affiliate fraud, and what to watch for:  1. Unusual Click-to-Install Time (CTIT) Patterns Fraudsters flood fake clicks to hijack credit for real installs, distorting CTIT and attribution data, making affiliates look like they are delivering genuine users.  Festive Relevance:  High install surges make fake CTIT timings harder to spot.  Affiliates stuff clicks before festive installs to claim credit.  What to Watch For:  Installs happening too fast (<10 seconds) often indicate bot-driven installs.  Installs delayed too long (>24 hours) indicate click flooding.  CTI < 0.1% likely indicates click spamming.   2. Abnormal Post-Install Behavior  Fraudulent or fake installs may look valid at first but fail to deliver meaningful engagement or purchases post-install, inflating top-of-funnel numbers while draining budgets.  Festive Relevance:  Real festive shoppers browse more, add to cart, and purchase.  Fraudsters simulate installs or spoof in-app events only to claim payouts.  What to Watch For:  High installs with shallow sessions or instant exits.  Zero meaningful actions like adds-to-cart or purchases.  3. Click Injection and Click Spamming  Fraudsters generate fake clicks just before a user installs your app organically, stealing credit from genuine traffic.  Festive Relevance:  With installs surging, fraudsters have more organic actions to hijack.  Affiliates exploit festive urgency to push suspicious click activity.  What to Watch For:  Affiliates with sudden spikes in attributed installs.  Install timelines overlapping heavily with organic traffic.  4. Device Farms and Emulator Traffic Large-scale device farms and emulators simulate fake installs and user activity, tricking attribution systems into marking them as conversions.  Festive Relevance:  Higher festive payouts make device farms highly profitable.  Thousands of fake users can be generated overnight.  What to Watch For:  Repeated installs from identical OS versions or device models.  High device reset rates from the same source.  5. Geo-Mismatch and Proxy

Marketers’ DIY Guide: Safeguard Your Festive Season Ad Spend from Mobile Ad Fraud Read More »

Scroll to Top